Referred to the Subcommittee on Aviation.
Creates a Department of Transportation grant program funding surface transportation projects that connect to public airports. Eligible applicants are states, tribes, and local governments; projects must be within five miles and reduce congestion, expand capacity, or rehabilitate road, rail, or transit infrastructure.
Allocation floors: large/medium hub emphasis versus small airports equity
Relative to its intended legislative type, this bill establishes a clear substantive policy change by creating and funding a federal grant program for surface transportation projects that connect to airports, with defined eligibility, project scope, cost-share references, and multi-year appropriation amounts.
Creates a Department of Transportation grant program funding surface transportation projects that connect to public airports.
Eligible applicants are states, tribes, and local governments; projects must be within five miles and reduce congestion, expand capacity, or rehabilitate road, rail, or transit infrastructure.
At least 50% of annual funds must go to projects serving large hub airports and at least 30% to medium hubs.
Modest, bipartisan-leaning infrastructure proposal with measurable local benefits increases prospects, but final enactment depends on appropriations and larger legislative packaging.
Relative to its intended legislative type, this bill establishes a clear substantive policy change by creating and funding a federal grant program for surface transportation projects that connect to airports, with defined eligibility, project scope, cost-share references, and multi-year appropriation amounts. It integrates well with existing statutory authorities. However, it delegates most procedural, selection, and accountability details to agency implementation without providing statutory guidance on application criteria, oversight, performance measurement, or safeguards.
Allocation floors: large/medium hub emphasis versus small airports equity
These are examples from the analysis, not a ranked list of the most-affected groups.
Allocation floors: large/medium hub emphasis versus small airports equity
Likely broadly supportive of targeted airport-access investments that improve transit access and reduce congestion, while seeking stronger climate, equity, and labor provisions.
May be concerned the hub-focused funding allocation overlooks small and rural communities and prioritizes highways over transit and rail.
Generally favorable as a targeted infrastructure program that alleviates airport access bottlenecks and supports economic activity.
Wants stronger transparency, clear selection criteria, cost‑benefit requirements, and prudent fiscal oversight to limit waste and duplication.
Mixed to skeptical: supportive of improved airport access and economic benefits, but concerned about new federal spending, use of Highway Trust Fund, and federal program expansion.
Prefers stronger state and local decision‑making and higher non‑federal shares.
Reached or meaningfully advanced
Reached or meaningfully advanced
Still ahead
Still ahead
Still ahead
Modest, bipartisan-leaning infrastructure proposal with measurable local benefits increases prospects, but final enactment depends on appropriations and larger legislative packaging.
The bill has not accumulated any surfaced votes yet.
Allocation floors: large/medium hub emphasis versus small airports equity
Modest, bipartisan-leaning infrastructure proposal with measurable local benefits increases prospects, but final enactment depends on appro…
Relative to its intended legislative type, this bill establishes a clear substantive policy change by creating and funding a federal grant program for surface transportation projects that connect to airports, with defin…
Go beyond the headline summary with full stakeholder mapping, legislative design analysis, passage barriers, and lens-by-lens tradeoff breakdowns.