H.R. 3755 (119th)Bill Overview

Safe Stay Act

Commerce|Commerce
Cosponsors
Support
Lean Democratic
Introduced
Jun 5, 2025
Discussions
Bill Text
Current stageCommittee

Referred to the Committee on Science, Space, and Technology, and in addition to the Committee on Energy and Commerce, for a period to be subsequently determined by the Speaker, in…

Introduced
Committee
Floor
President
Law
Congressional Activities
01 · The brief

Amends the Federal Fire Prevention and Control Act to require compliant carbon monoxide (CO) alarms in every sleeping or dwelling unit within places of public accommodation affecting commerce.

Defines “compliant carbon monoxide alarm,” references NFPA 72 and the International Fire Code, requires states and FEMA to update lists, mandates guest check-in notices attesting compliance, gives the FTC enforcement authority for the notice requirement, and allows higher local standards.

The notice requirement takes effect one year after enactment.

Passage50/100

Modest overall chance: clear safety purpose aids passage, but regulatory cost burden without funding and Senate hurdles reduce likelihood.

CredibilityPartially aligned

Relative to its intended legislative type, this bill is a substantive statutory amendment that clearly creates new legal obligations (mandatory carbon monoxide alarm installation) and integrates those obligations into existing codes and enforcement authorities, but it lacks fiscal acknowledgement, detailed timelines for achieving physical compliance, and robust handling of edge cases.

Contention62/100

Progressives emphasize public-health and equity benefits.

02 · What it does

Who stands to gain, and who may push back.

Who this appears to help vs burden50% / 50%
Targeted stakeholdersTargeted stakeholders
Likely helped
  • Targeted stakeholdersLikely reduces carbon monoxide poisoning incidents among guests by ensuring detection in sleeping units.
  • Targeted stakeholdersCreates a uniform national baseline for carbon monoxide alarms in public accommodations, simplifying compliance standar…
  • Targeted stakeholdersIncreases demand for carbon monoxide alarm manufacturing, installation, and maintenance, potentially creating related j…
Likely burdened
  • Targeted stakeholdersImposes upfront purchase and installation costs on owners of hotels, motels, and other lodging providers.
  • Targeted stakeholdersCreates recurring costs for testing, battery replacement, and equipment upkeep for lodging operators.
  • Targeted stakeholdersSubjects operators to FTC enforcement and potential penalties for noncompliant or inaccurate check-in notices.
03 · Why people split

Why the argument around this bill splits.

Progressives emphasize public-health and equity benefits.
Progressive90%

Likely supportive because the bill advances public safety, consumer protection, and equitable safety standards in lodging.

Would favor stronger enforcement, funding assistance for small operators, and broader coverage where gaps exist.

Leans supportive
Centrist70%

Generally favorable as a targeted public-safety upgrade with a one-year phase for the notice provision.

Sees practical benefits but wants clarity on costs, scope, and administrative burden.

Leans supportive
Conservative25%

Skeptical of a federal mandate imposing installation and notification requirements on private businesses.

Prefers state/local code control, voluntary approaches, or federal cost-sharing rather than FTC-driven enforcement.

Likely resistant
04 · Can it pass?

The path through Congress.

Introduced

Reached or meaningfully advanced

Committee

Reached or meaningfully advanced

Floor

Still ahead

President

Still ahead

Law

Still ahead

Passage likelihood50/100

Modest overall chance: clear safety purpose aids passage, but regulatory cost burden without funding and Senate hurdles reduce likelihood.

Scope and complexity
24%
Scopenarrow
24%
Complexitylow
Why this could stall
  • Absent cost estimates for installations and compliance
  • Potential opposition from hotel/motel and small-business groups
05 · Recent votes

Recent votes on the bill.

No vote history yet

The bill has not accumulated any surfaced votes yet.

06 · Go deeper

Go deeper than the headline read.

Included on this page

Progressives emphasize public-health and equity benefits.

Modest overall chance: clear safety purpose aids passage, but regulatory cost burden without funding and Senate hurdles reduce likelihood.

Unlocked analysis

Relative to its intended legislative type, this bill is a substantive statutory amendment that clearly creates new legal obligations (mandatory carbon monoxide alarm installation) and integrates those obligations into e…

Go beyond the headline summary with full stakeholder mapping, legislative design analysis, passage barriers, and lens-by-lens tradeoff breakdowns.

Perspective breakdownsPassage barriersLegislative design reviewStakeholder impact map
Open full analysis