Referred to the Subcommittee on Coast Guard and Maritime Transportation.
The bill creates a U.S. government framework to combat illegal, unreported, and unregulated (IUU) fishing and related forced labor globally.
It establishes a public IUU vessel (black) list, prohibits certain port access and imports, authorizes Treasury sanctions and visa restrictions, directs Coast Guard enforcement and interagency data sharing, funds NOAA activities, and mandates studies and capacity-building efforts.
Technocratic, narrow-purpose bill with modest funding and clear enforcement tools increases viability, but sanctions, trade implications, and interagency complexity lower odds.
Relative to its intended legislative type, this bill is a well‑constructed substantive policy change that provides detailed mechanisms, clear definitions, integration with existing law, specified implementers and timelines, and multiple reporting requirements. It combines enforcement authorities (list, import/port prohibitions, forfeiture, sanctions) with capacity‑building and study requirements.
Liberals emphasize human-rights and stronger funding; conservatives question executive overreach.
Liberals emphasize human-rights and stronger funding; conservatives question executive overreach.
Likely broadly supportive because the bill targets environmental harm, human trafficking, and forced labor in global fisheries.
Would press for stronger funding, worker protections, and transparent due-process safeguards for listed entities.
Generally supportive of stronger tools against IUU fishing, while cautious about implementation, international law, and trade impacts.
Wants clear processes, interagency coordination, and metrics to avoid unnecessary trade friction.
Supportive of stronger enforcement, national-security framing, and sanctions against bad actors, especially state-linked fleets.
Some concern about expanding executive sanction authority and additional federal obligations without offsets.
Reached or meaningfully advanced
Reached or meaningfully advanced
Still ahead
Still ahead
Still ahead
Technocratic, narrow-purpose bill with modest funding and clear enforcement tools increases viability, but sanctions, trade implications, and interagency complexity lower odds.
The bill has not accumulated any surfaced votes yet.
Liberals emphasize human-rights and stronger funding; conservatives question executive overreach.
Technocratic, narrow-purpose bill with modest funding and clear enforcement tools increases viability, but sanctions, trade implications, a…
Relative to its intended legislative type, this bill is a well‑constructed substantive policy change that provides detailed mechanisms, clear definitions, integration with existing law, specified implementers and timeli…
Go beyond the headline summary with full stakeholder mapping, legislative design analysis, passage barriers, and lens-by-lens tradeoff breakdowns.