Referred to the House Committee on the Judiciary.
The bill requires courts to stay (pause) civil actions that are filed, initiated, or continued by a presidential candidate (within 90 days of the general election), the President-elect, or the President. Stays last until the end of the President’s term, or for losing candidates until the House ratifies election results.
Progressives emphasize accountability harm and shielding of wrongdoing
Relative to its intended legislative type, this bill creates a substantive change to civil litigation rules by directing courts to enter stays and tolling for civil actions involving certain persons and entities tied to the Presidency.
The bill requires courts to stay (pause) civil actions that are filed, initiated, or continued by a presidential candidate (within 90 days of the general election), the President-elect, or the President.
Stays last until the end of the President’s term, or for losing candidates until the House ratifies election results.
The stay also covers immediate family members and entities listing the President or family member as grantor or beneficiary, with tolling of statutes of limitations.
High controversy over presidential accountability, legal ambiguity, and lack of compromise features make enactment unlikely based on content alone.
Relative to its intended legislative type, this bill creates a substantive change to civil litigation rules by directing courts to enter stays and tolling for civil actions involving certain persons and entities tied to the Presidency. It specifies the principal rule, in limited form, and a few narrow exceptions and definitions.
Progressives emphasize accountability harm and shielding of wrongdoing
These are examples from the analysis, not a ranked list of the most-affected groups.
Progressives emphasize accountability harm and shielding of wrongdoing
Likely views the bill as a problematic limitation on accountability and civil remedies for wrongdoing by a President or close associates.
May accept narrow protection for official duties, but opposes broad stays that delay plaintiffs and shield family/business interests.
Views the underlying aim—preventing settlements that influence elections and protecting executive focus—as legitimate, but is concerned about vagueness and unintended consequences.
Would want clearer definitions and narrow exceptions before supporting.
Likely supportive of measures that shield the presidency from politically motivated litigation and preserve executive function.
Still concerned about appearing to grant special protections and might prefer narrower, more explicit statutory language.
Reached or meaningfully advanced
Reached or meaningfully advanced
Still ahead
Still ahead
Still ahead
High controversy over presidential accountability, legal ambiguity, and lack of compromise features make enactment unlikely based on content alone.
The bill has not accumulated any surfaced votes yet.
Progressives emphasize accountability harm and shielding of wrongdoing
High controversy over presidential accountability, legal ambiguity, and lack of compromise features make enactment unlikely based on conten…
Relative to its intended legislative type, this bill creates a substantive change to civil litigation rules by directing courts to enter stays and tolling for civil actions involving certain persons and entities tied to…
Go beyond the headline summary with full stakeholder mapping, legislative design analysis, passage barriers, and lens-by-lens tradeoff breakdowns.