H.R. 381 (119th)Bill Overview

LNG Public Interest Determination Act of 2025

Environmental Protection|Alternative and renewable resourcesClimate change and greenhouse gases
Cosponsors
Support
Democratic
Introduced
Jan 14, 2025
Discussions
Bill Text
Current stageCommittee

Referred to the House Committee on Energy and Commerce.

Introduced
Committee
Floor
President
Law
Congressional Activities
01 · The brief
Plain-English summaryWhat this bill actually does

The bill amends the Natural Gas Act to require a Secretary of Energy order before exporting any natural gas from the United States. The Secretary must find, after public participation and specific assessments, that the proposed export will not likely (A) significantly contribute to climate change, (B) materially increase U.S. energy prices or volatility for defined consumer groups, or (C) create disproportionate cumulative burdens on rural, low-income, minority, and other vulnerable communities.

Why people may split

Climate standard (20-year methane GWP) versus industry competitiveness

Watch point

Relative to its intended legislative type, this bill is a well-specified substantive policy change that amends the Natural Gas Act to add new public-interest criteria and detailed assessment requirements for LNG exports, with clear mechanisms and statutory integration but limited fiscal and contingency planning.

The bill amends the Natural Gas Act to require a Secretary of Energy order before exporting any natural gas from the United States.

The Secretary must find, after public participation and specific assessments, that the proposed export will not likely (A) significantly contribute to climate change, (B) materially increase U.S. energy prices or volatility for defined consumer groups, or (C) create disproportionate cumulative burdens on rural, low-income, minority, and other vulnerable communities.

Assessments must include lifecycle greenhouse gas estimates using methane's 20-year global warming potential, economic impacts on consumer subgroups, environmental justice impacts, and quantified social cost estimates; FERC categorical exclusion B5.7 is revoked.

Passage15/100

High ideological salience, significant industry and regional economic opposition, and procedural hurdles make enactment unlikely absent major compromise.

CredibilityPartially aligned

Relative to its intended legislative type, this bill is a well-specified substantive policy change that amends the Natural Gas Act to add new public-interest criteria and detailed assessment requirements for LNG exports, with clear mechanisms and statutory integration but limited fiscal and contingency planning.

Contention70/100

Climate standard (20-year methane GWP) versus industry competitiveness

02 · What it does

Who stands to gain, and who may push back.

Likely benefits vs burdens50% / 50%
ConsumersDevelopers · States

These are examples from the analysis, not a ranked list of the most-affected groups.

Likely helped
  • Potential benefitReduces likelihood of approving exports that substantially increase global greenhouse gas emissions.
  • ConsumersSeeks to limit export-driven increases in domestic energy prices and price volatility for consumers.
  • Potential benefitRequires explicit analysis of cumulative harms to vulnerable communities, strengthening environmental justice considera…
Likely burdened
  • Potential burdenAdds procedural steps and likely lengthens approval timelines for LNG export projects.
  • DevelopersIncreases regulatory and compliance costs for project developers and exporters.
  • StatesMay reduce LNG export volumes, with potential negative effects on related jobs and state tax revenues.
03 · Why people split

Why the argument around this bill splits.

Climate standard (20-year methane GWP) versus industry competitiveness
Progressive90%

Likely broadly supportive because the bill explicitly integrates climate science, lifecycle emissions, and environmental justice into export approvals.

It shifts decisionmaking toward assessing long-term global emissions, consumer protection, and burdens on vulnerable communities.

Some progressives may nevertheless press for even stricter limits or an outright ban on new LNG exports.

Leans supportive
Centrist60%

Cautiously favorable to the bill's goal of a structured, transparent public-interest test balancing climate and consumer impacts, but wary about implementation complexity and timeliness.

Supports assessments and public participation but wants clear procedural rules, defensible metrics, and consideration of energy security and trade impacts.

Split reaction
Conservative20%

Likely opposed as an unnecessary regulatory expansion that will hinder U.S. natural gas exports, harm jobs and regional economies, and increase uncertainty for investors.

Removal of FTA-related exceptions and use of a stringent climate test (20-year methane GWP) are seen as punitive to the industry and trade relationships.

Likely resistant
04 · Can it pass?

The path through Congress.

Introduced

Reached or meaningfully advanced

Committee

Reached or meaningfully advanced

Floor

Still ahead

President

Still ahead

Law

Still ahead

Passage likelihood15/100

High ideological salience, significant industry and regional economic opposition, and procedural hurdles make enactment unlikely absent major compromise.

Scope and complexity
52%
Scopemoderate
52%
Complexitymedium
Why this could stall
  • How existing export authorizations would be treated under new law
  • Depth and timing of legal challenges and judicial review
05 · Recent votes

Recent votes on the bill.

No vote history yet

The bill has not accumulated any surfaced votes yet.

06 · Go deeper

Go deeper than the headline read.

Included on this page

Climate standard (20-year methane GWP) versus industry competitiveness

High ideological salience, significant industry and regional economic opposition, and procedural hurdles make enactment unlikely absent maj…

Unlocked analysis

Relative to its intended legislative type, this bill is a well-specified substantive policy change that amends the Natural Gas Act to add new public-interest criteria and detailed assessment requirements for LNG exports…

Go beyond the headline summary with full stakeholder mapping, legislative design analysis, passage barriers, and lens-by-lens tradeoff breakdowns.

Perspective breakdownsPassage barriersLegislative design reviewStakeholder impact map
Open full analysis