Referred to the House Committee on Veterans' Affairs.
This bill renames the Department of Veterans Affairs women’s health clinic (Red Team clinic) at the Clement J. Zablocki VA Medical Center in Milwaukee, Wisconsin, to the Anna Mae Robertson VA Well Woman Clinic.
Left emphasizes recognition for women veterans; right emphasizes limiting federal costs
Relative to its intended legislative type, this bill is a straightforward, narrowly focused commemorative naming provision that is clear about what is being named and how existing references should be interpreted.
This bill renames the Department of Veterans Affairs women’s health clinic (Red Team clinic) at the Clement J.
Zablocki VA Medical Center in Milwaukee, Wisconsin, to the Anna Mae Robertson VA Well Woman Clinic.
The new name takes effect upon enactment, and any U.S. government reference to the clinic will be considered to refer to the new name.
Honorific, narrow, noncontroversial bills historically clear Congress easily or are folded into larger vehicle; few content-based barriers.
Relative to its intended legislative type, this bill is a straightforward, narrowly focused commemorative naming provision that is clear about what is being named and how existing references should be interpreted.
Left emphasizes recognition for women veterans; right emphasizes limiting federal costs
These are examples from the analysis, not a ranked list of the most-affected groups.
Left emphasizes recognition for women veterans; right emphasizes limiting federal costs
Likely strongly supportive.
The bill recognizes and elevates women veterans' healthcare visibility by naming a VA women’s clinic for Anna Mae Robertson.
Supporters would view this as symbolic recognition of women veterans and a sign the VA values gender-specific care.
Generally supportive but pragmatic.
The renaming is a low-stakes symbolic measure honoring veterans while requiring modest administrative updates.
Centrists will weigh the symbolic value against any real cost and prefer assurances this is not diverting resources from care.
Likely broadly accepting but cautious.
Naming federal facilities is routine; many conservatives will support honoring veterans.
Some may object to perceived federal naming proliferation or taxpayer costs, wanting strict limits on expenditures.
Reached or meaningfully advanced
Reached or meaningfully advanced
Still ahead
Still ahead
Still ahead
Honorific, narrow, noncontroversial bills historically clear Congress easily or are folded into larger vehicle; few content-based barriers.
The bill has not accumulated any surfaced votes yet.
Left emphasizes recognition for women veterans; right emphasizes limiting federal costs
Honorific, narrow, noncontroversial bills historically clear Congress easily or are folded into larger vehicle; few content-based barriers.
Relative to its intended legislative type, this bill is a straightforward, narrowly focused commemorative naming provision that is clear about what is being named and how existing references should be interpreted.
Go beyond the headline summary with full stakeholder mapping, legislative design analysis, passage barriers, and lens-by-lens tradeoff breakdowns.