Referred to the Committee on Foreign Affairs, and in addition to the Committee on the Judiciary, for a period to be subsequently determined by the Speaker, in each case for consid…
The Combating Global Corruption Act of 2025 requires the Secretary of State to publish an annual tiered ranking of foreign countries based on government efforts to prevent and punish corruption, using defined minimum standards and assessment factors. The Secretary should evaluate persons in tier 3 countries for possible designation under the Global Magnitsky sanctions authority, report to relevant Congressional committees, and designate embassy anti‑corruption points of contact with training and coordination responsibilities.
Sanctions emphasis: liberals prioritize accountability; conservatives prioritize national interest and limits
Relative to its intended legislative type, this bill sets out clear administrative duties and frameworks (annual tiered country list, assessment factors, reporting requirements, and embassy anti-corruption points of contact) and reasonably integrates with existing sanction authorities.
The Combating Global Corruption Act of 2025 requires the Secretary of State to publish an annual tiered ranking of foreign countries based on government efforts to prevent and punish corruption, using defined minimum standards and assessment factors.
The Secretary should evaluate persons in tier 3 countries for possible designation under the Global Magnitsky sanctions authority, report to relevant Congressional committees, and designate embassy anti‑corruption points of contact with training and coordination responsibilities.
The bill defines "corrupt actor," "corruption," and "significant corruption," and lists factors and international conventions to be considered in assessments.
Reasonable bipartisan appeal and low fiscal cost increase odds, but diplomatic sensitivities and Senate procedure reduce overall probability.
Relative to its intended legislative type, this bill sets out clear administrative duties and frameworks (annual tiered country list, assessment factors, reporting requirements, and embassy anti-corruption points of contact) and reasonably integrates with existing sanction authorities. It provides defined roles and some timelines but leaves substantial implementation details—methodology, resourcing, procedural safeguards, and enforcement/backstop mechanisms—unspecified.
Sanctions emphasis: liberals prioritize accountability; conservatives prioritize national interest and limits
These are examples from the analysis, not a ranked list of the most-affected groups.
Sanctions emphasis: liberals prioritize accountability; conservatives prioritize national interest and limits
Likely broadly supportive: sees the bill as a concrete, rights‑aligned tool to hold kleptocrats accountable, protect victims, and strengthen civil society.
Would press for strong enforcement, asset recovery, and safeguards for whistleblowers and due process.
Generally supportive but pragmatic: values the bill's measurable framework and use of existing Magnitsky authority, while wanting clearer criteria, cost estimates, and protections to avoid unintended diplomatic or legal consequences.
Mixed-to-skeptical: supports anti‑corruption objectives and use of sanctions against foreign kleptocrats, but worries the ranking system and embassy bureaucracy represent federal overreach and could harm trade or national interests.
Reached or meaningfully advanced
Reached or meaningfully advanced
Still ahead
Still ahead
Still ahead
Reasonable bipartisan appeal and low fiscal cost increase odds, but diplomatic sensitivities and Senate procedure reduce overall probability.
The bill has not accumulated any surfaced votes yet.
Sanctions emphasis: liberals prioritize accountability; conservatives prioritize national interest and limits
Reasonable bipartisan appeal and low fiscal cost increase odds, but diplomatic sensitivities and Senate procedure reduce overall probabilit…
Relative to its intended legislative type, this bill sets out clear administrative duties and frameworks (annual tiered country list, assessment factors, reporting requirements, and embassy anti-corruption points of con…
Go beyond the headline summary with full stakeholder mapping, legislative design analysis, passage barriers, and lens-by-lens tradeoff breakdowns.