- Local governmentsIncreases federal funding share for disaster response, reducing local fiscal burdens in qualifying areas.
- Potential benefitEnables hazard mitigation purchases like snow removal equipment, potentially reducing future winter storm damage.
- Potential benefitAllows faster or more frequent major disaster declarations for qualifying winter storms via waiver provisions.
SNOW Act of 2025
Referred to the Subcommittee on Economic Development, Public Buildings, and Emergency Management.
Amends the Stafford Act to expand federal disaster assistance for winter storms, define winter storms, allow hazard mitigation funds to buy snow-removal equipment, create a waiver process to relax snowfall and statewide damage thresholds for disaster declarations under certain conditions, and raise the minimum federal cost share to 75 percent (90 percent in rural or disadvantaged areas) for several assistance programs.
Role of federal government versus state/local responsibility
Relative to its intended legislative type, this bill effects substantive statutory changes to the Stafford Act by expanding winter-storm-related assistance, defining 'winter storm', creating a waiver pathway for threshold requirements, and increasing federal cost shares for rural or disadvantaged areas while integrating those changes into existing statutory sections.
Amends the Stafford Act to expand federal disaster assistance for winter storms, define winter storms, allow hazard mitigation funds to buy snow-removal equipment, create a waiver process to relax snowfall and statewide damage thresholds for disaster declarations under certain conditions, and raise the minimum federal cost share to 75 percent (90 percent in rural or disadvantaged areas) for several assistance programs.
Technocratic, narrow disaster-relief bill has bipartisan potential but adds federal cost and waiver powers that raise legislative scrutiny.
Relative to its intended legislative type, this bill effects substantive statutory changes to the Stafford Act by expanding winter-storm-related assistance, defining 'winter storm', creating a waiver pathway for threshold requirements, and increasing federal cost shares for rural or disadvantaged areas while integrating those changes into existing statutory sections.
Role of federal government versus state/local responsibility
Who stands to gain, and who may push back.
These are examples from the analysis, not a ranked list of the most-affected groups.
- Federal agenciesRaises Federal spending exposure through higher cost‑share minimums and expanded program eligibility.
- Local governmentsCould reduce state or local incentives to invest in mitigation if federal coverage becomes more generous.
- Potential burdenRequires FEMA rulemaking and new administrative processes, increasing regulatory and implementation burden.
Why the argument around this bill splits.
Role of federal government versus state/local responsibility
Likely supportive because the bill increases federal aid to low‑income and rural communities, improves resilience, and explicitly allows mitigation equipment purchases.
It targets assistance to disadvantaged areas and broadens eligibility for winter‑storm impacts.
Will view the bill as a practical, incremental improvement to disaster response for winter storms but will want clear rules, cost estimates, and guardrails against misuse.
Generally favorable if oversight and fiscal controls are added.
Skeptical because it expands federal authority, raises federal cost shares, and creates waiver pathways that may reduce state responsibility.
Might accept targeted disaster help but opposes expanding long‑term federal roles.
The path through Congress.
Reached or meaningfully advanced
Reached or meaningfully advanced
Still ahead
Still ahead
Still ahead
Technocratic, narrow disaster-relief bill has bipartisan potential but adds federal cost and waiver powers that raise legislative scrutiny.
- Estimated budgetary cost and CBO score not included
- Level of bipartisan support in relevant committees
Recent votes on the bill.
No vote history yet
The bill has not accumulated any surfaced votes yet.
Go deeper than the headline read.
Role of federal government versus state/local responsibility
Technocratic, narrow disaster-relief bill has bipartisan potential but adds federal cost and waiver powers that raise legislative scrutiny.
Relative to its intended legislative type, this bill effects substantive statutory changes to the Stafford Act by expanding winter-storm-related assistance, defining 'winter storm', creating a waiver pathway for thresho…
Go beyond the headline summary with full stakeholder mapping, legislative design analysis, passage barriers, and lens-by-lens tradeoff breakdowns.