Referred to the Committee on Energy and Commerce, and in addition to the Committee on Financial Services, for a period to be subsequently determined by the Speaker, in each case f…
This bill (DASHBOARD Act of 2025) requires commercial data operators and certain publicly reporting companies that derive material revenue from user data to disclose the value and uses of user data and to give users routine information and deletion controls. It directs commercial data operators to provide each user, at least every 90 days, an assessment of the economic value the operator places on that user’s data and clear disclosures about what data are collected and how data are used beyond the core service, and to provide user-accessible deletion mechanisms subject to limited legal and security exceptions.
Scope and thresholds: liberals want broader coverage and stronger rights; conservatives prefer higher thresholds and narrower scope.
Relative to its intended legislative type, this bill establishes substantive legal obligations (new disclosure and consumer data-handling duties), integrates those obligations into existing statutes, and assigns regulatory execution to the FTC and SEC with several concrete deadlines and enumerated disclosure items.
This bill (DASHBOARD Act of 2025) requires commercial data operators and certain publicly reporting companies that derive material revenue from user data to disclose the value and uses of user data and to give users routine information and deletion controls.
It directs commercial data operators to provide each user, at least every 90 days, an assessment of the economic value the operator places on that user’s data and clear disclosures about what data are collected and how data are used beyond the core service, and to provide user-accessible deletion mechanisms subject to limited legal and security exceptions.
The Federal Trade Commission must adopt regulations implementing the user-facing requirements within one year and enforce violations as unfair or deceptive acts, while the Securities and Exchange Commission must require covered issuers to disclose aggregate values of user data (if material), adopt valuation methodologies, and expand financial-reporting disclosures about data-related measures, risks, revenues, contracts, and acquisitions; the SEC must also report to Congress and follow up with rulemaking.
On content alone, the bill is targeted and technical enough to win some support (consumer transparency, limited covered population, staged rulemakings), but it reaches into contentious terrain—valuation of user data, expanded disclosure obligations for large platforms, and new enforcement roles—that draws strong industry opposition and raises accounting/implementation challenges. The need for durable, cross-branch technical rulemaking and potential legal challenges further reduce near-term enactment chances.
Relative to its intended legislative type, this bill establishes substantive legal obligations (new disclosure and consumer data-handling duties), integrates those obligations into existing statutes, and assigns regulatory execution to the FTC and SEC with several concrete deadlines and enumerated disclosure items.
Scope and thresholds: liberals want broader coverage and stronger rights; conservatives prefer higher thresholds and narrower scope.
These are examples from the analysis, not a ranked list of the most-affected groups.
Scope and thresholds: liberals want broader coverage and stronger rights; conservatives prefer higher thresholds and narrower scope.
A mainstream liberal would generally view the bill as a positive step toward corporate accountability, consumer empowerment, and transparency about how companies monetize personal data.
They would appreciate mandated user notices, deletion controls, and SEC disclosures that bring investor scrutiny to data-driven business models.
However, they would likely see the bill as only a partial win because the user-deletion exceptions, high company-size threshold (100 million monthly users), and reliance on regulator rulemaking could limit reach and effectiveness.
A centrist or moderate would generally see this bill as a pragmatic effort to increase transparency for investors and consumers without upending existing business models.
They would appreciate the measured approach—agency rulemaking, defined scope tied to large-scale operators, and specific reporting lines—while being cautious about implementation costs and feasibility of valuing data.
They would look for clear timelines, robust cost-benefit analysis, and careful rule design to avoid unnecessary burdens on companies or gaps in consumer protection.
A mainstream conservative would likely oppose much of the bill as an expansion of federal regulatory authority over private businesses, especially due to added SEC and FTC rulemaking and the potential disclosure of commercially sensitive information.
They would accept the goal of transparency for investors in principle but worry that mandated valuation of data and frequent user notices impose heavy compliance burdens, risk disclosure of trade secrets, and create competitive disadvantages.
They would push to limit scope, protect proprietary information, and require stronger limits on agency power and costs.
Reached or meaningfully advanced
Reached or meaningfully advanced
Still ahead
Still ahead
Still ahead
On content alone, the bill is targeted and technical enough to win some support (consumer transparency, limited covered population, staged rulemakings), but it reaches into contentious terrain—valuation of user data, expanded disclosure obligations for large platforms, and new enforcement roles—that draws strong industry opposition and raises accounting/implementation challenges. The need for durable, cross-branch technical rulemaking and potential legal challenges further reduce near-term enactment chances.
The bill has not accumulated any surfaced votes yet.
Scope and thresholds: liberals want broader coverage and stronger rights; conservatives prefer higher thresholds and narrower scope.
On content alone, the bill is targeted and technical enough to win some support (consumer transparency, limited covered population, staged…
Relative to its intended legislative type, this bill establishes substantive legal obligations (new disclosure and consumer data-handling duties), integrates those obligations into existing statutes, and assigns regulat…
Go beyond the headline summary with full stakeholder mapping, legislative design analysis, passage barriers, and lens-by-lens tradeoff breakdowns.