Referred to the House Committee on Armed Services.
This bill bars the use of Federal funds to close or realign the Marine Corps Recruit Depot (MCRD) at Parris Island, South Carolina. It also prohibits spending for planning or activities related to such closure or realignment and includes congressional findings about the depot's historical and training significance.
Whether protecting Parris Island outweighs DoD flexibility to consolidate
Relative to its intended legislative type, this bill is a clear, narrowly focused administrative/operational restriction implemented via a funding prohibition.
This bill bars the use of Federal funds to close or realign the Marine Corps Recruit Depot (MCRD) at Parris Island, South Carolina.
It also prohibits spending for planning or activities related to such closure or realignment and includes congressional findings about the depot's historical and training significance.
The statute codifies that Parris Island remain the physical home of the Marine Corps Eastern Recruiting Region and calls for continued investment.
Modest chance if folded into a larger defense bill with local coalitions; standalone enactment is less likely because it directly limits DoD planning and lacks compromise features.
Relative to its intended legislative type, this bill is a clear, narrowly focused administrative/operational restriction implemented via a funding prohibition. It states its purpose and authority succinctly but omits operational definitions, temporal parameters, integration with existing statutory frameworks, fiscal acknowledgement, exception handling, and oversight provisions.
Whether protecting Parris Island outweighs DoD flexibility to consolidate
These are examples from the analysis, not a ranked list of the most-affected groups.
Whether protecting Parris Island outweighs DoD flexibility to consolidate
Likely cautiously supportive because the bill protects jobs, a historic military community, and local economic stability.
May be concerned about limiting Department of Defense (DoD) flexibility and potential opportunity costs, but overall sympathetic to veteran and community impacts.
Pragmatic support is likely, emphasizing economic stability and continuity of training while noting governance trade-offs.
Would want documentation that the restriction won’t harm readiness or create large unfunded costs.
Strongly supportive; views the bill as protecting military tradition, readiness, and local jobs.
Sees congressional protection as appropriate for a longstanding Marine Corps institution and likely opposes any effort to relocate or downsize Parris Island.
Reached or meaningfully advanced
Reached or meaningfully advanced
Still ahead
Still ahead
Still ahead
Modest chance if folded into a larger defense bill with local coalitions; standalone enactment is less likely because it directly limits DoD planning and lacks compromise features.
The bill has not accumulated any surfaced votes yet.
Whether protecting Parris Island outweighs DoD flexibility to consolidate
Modest chance if folded into a larger defense bill with local coalitions; standalone enactment is less likely because it directly limits Do…
Relative to its intended legislative type, this bill is a clear, narrowly focused administrative/operational restriction implemented via a funding prohibition. It states its purpose and authority succinctly but omits op…
Go beyond the headline summary with full stakeholder mapping, legislative design analysis, passage barriers, and lens-by-lens tradeoff breakdowns.