H.R. 473 (119th)Bill Overview

SHOW UP Act of 2025

Government Operations and Politics|Cardiovascular and respiratory healthCommuting
Cosponsors
Support
Republican
Introduced
Jan 16, 2025
Discussions
Bill Text
Current stageCommittee

Referred to the House Committee on Oversight and Government Reform.

Introduced
Committee
Floor
President
Law
Congressional Activities
01 · The brief
Plain-English summaryWhat this bill actually does

The bill requires Executive agencies to restore telework policies, practices, and levels to those in effect on December 31, 2019, within 30 days. Agencies may not expand telework beyond that baseline until submitting a six-month study and a telework plan to Congress, and obtaining an OPM Director certification that the plan meets specified performance, cost, dispersal, and security criteria.

Why people may split

Progressives emphasize worker flexibility and accommodation harms

Watch point

Relative to its intended legislative type, this bill provides a clear directive to reinstate pre-pandemic telework policies, identifies responsible entities and deadlines, and creates a study-and-certification process to authorize any future expansions.

The bill requires Executive agencies to restore telework policies, practices, and levels to those in effect on December 31, 2019, within 30 days.

Agencies may not expand telework beyond that baseline until submitting a six-month study and a telework plan to Congress, and obtaining an OPM Director certification that the plan meets specified performance, cost, dispersal, and security criteria.

Agencies may resubmit plans if the Director withholds certification.

Passage30/100

Focused administrative change with high partisan salience and contested impacts on federal employees; procedural hurdles and need for Senate consensus lower odds.

CredibilityPartially aligned

Relative to its intended legislative type, this bill provides a clear directive to reinstate pre-pandemic telework policies, identifies responsible entities and deadlines, and creates a study-and-certification process to authorize any future expansions. Its construction is procedurally coherent but limited in operational detail necessary for comprehensive implementation across varied agencies.

Contention70/100

Progressives emphasize worker flexibility and accommodation harms

02 · What it does

Who stands to gain, and who may push back.

Likely benefits vs burdens50% / 50%
Workers · Local governmentsFederal agencies

These are examples from the analysis, not a ranked list of the most-affected groups.

Likely helped
  • WorkersIn-person work may improve collaboration, supervision, and mission-focused productivity.
  • Potential benefitOPM certification requirement increases centralized accountability for telework expansions.
  • Local governmentsCertified expansions must demonstrate substantial reductions in real property or locality pay costs.
Likely burdened
  • Federal agenciesReduced telework flexibility could worsen federal recruitment and employee retention.
  • Potential burdenMore commuting raises employee time costs and increases greenhouse gas emissions.
  • Potential burdenReinstating pre-pandemic onsite levels could increase short-term facility and operational costs.
03 · Why people split

Why the argument around this bill splits.

Progressives emphasize worker flexibility and accommodation harms
Progressive20%

Likely views this as a rollback of worker flexibility and an imposition on employees who rely on remote work.

Appreciates study and security focus but worries about harms to caregivers, disabled workers, recruitment, and climate goals.

Likely resistant
Centrist55%

Sees valid goals—improving service, security, and cost control—but worries the 30-day rollback and vague certification tests are rushed.

Supports evidence-based reform and clearer metrics.

Split reaction
Conservative85%

Likely supportive; views the bill as restoring in-person accountability and reducing excessive telework.

Appreciates OPM oversight and cost-focused certification requirements.

Leans supportive
04 · Can it pass?

The path through Congress.

Introduced

Reached or meaningfully advanced

Committee

Reached or meaningfully advanced

Floor

Still ahead

President

Still ahead

Law

Still ahead

Passage likelihood30/100

Focused administrative change with high partisan salience and contested impacts on federal employees; procedural hurdles and need for Senate consensus lower odds.

Scope and complexity
52%
Scopemoderate
52%
Complexitymedium
Why this could stall
  • No cost estimate or score provided
  • Possible legal or collective-bargaining challenges by unions
05 · Recent votes

Recent votes on the bill.

No vote history yet

The bill has not accumulated any surfaced votes yet.

06 · Go deeper

Go deeper than the headline read.

Included on this page

Progressives emphasize worker flexibility and accommodation harms

Focused administrative change with high partisan salience and contested impacts on federal employees; procedural hurdles and need for Senat…

Unlocked analysis

Relative to its intended legislative type, this bill provides a clear directive to reinstate pre-pandemic telework policies, identifies responsible entities and deadlines, and creates a study-and-certification process t…

Go beyond the headline summary with full stakeholder mapping, legislative design analysis, passage barriers, and lens-by-lens tradeoff breakdowns.

Perspective breakdownsPassage barriersLegislative design reviewStakeholder impact map
Open full analysis