H.R. 487 (119th)Bill Overview

Hawaii Invasive Species Protection Act

Agriculture and Food|Agriculture and FoodAviation and airports
Sponsor
Cosponsors
Support
Democratic
Introduced
Jan 16, 2025
Discussions
Bill Text
Current stageCommittee

Referred to the House Committee on Agriculture.

Introduced
Committee
Floor
President
Law
Congressional Activities
01 · The brief
Plain-English summaryWhat this bill actually does

This bill requires USDA (APHIS), working with federal agencies and the government of Hawaii, to conduct preclearance visual, x-ray, and canine quarantine inspections of persons, baggage, cargo, mail, and other articles moving directly to or from Hawaii by domestic or international travel. Inspections must occur at departure/interline airports, ports of departure, and USPS destination sectional center facilities.

Why people may split

Environmental protection urgency versus perceived federal regulatory overreach

Watch point

Relative to its intended legislative type, this bill creates substantive legal obligations and fee authorities to establish a Hawaii-focused preclearance inspection regime and integrates those requirements into existing statutory frameworks, but it leaves out several operational and oversight details that are typically expected for a program of this scale.

This bill requires USDA (APHIS), working with federal agencies and the government of Hawaii, to conduct preclearance visual, x-ray, and canine quarantine inspections of persons, baggage, cargo, mail, and other articles moving directly to or from Hawaii by domestic or international travel.

Inspections must occur at departure/interline airports, ports of departure, and USPS destination sectional center facilities.

The bill directs APHIS and Hawaii to publish a list of high-risk invasive species and agricultural materials within 180 days, authorizes seizure and disposal under existing law, and amends statutes to allow and require user fees sufficient to cover the full cost of these inspections.

Passage40/100

Technocratic, narrowly targeted measure with fee offset improves prospects, but operational burdens and stakeholder resistance reduce likelihood.

CredibilityPartially aligned

Relative to its intended legislative type, this bill creates substantive legal obligations and fee authorities to establish a Hawaii-focused preclearance inspection regime and integrates those requirements into existing statutory frameworks, but it leaves out several operational and oversight details that are typically expected for a program of this scale.

Contention70/100

Environmental protection urgency versus perceived federal regulatory overreach

02 · What it does

Who stands to gain, and who may push back.

Likely benefits vs burdens50% / 50%
Federal agenciesLikely burdened

These are examples from the analysis, not a ranked list of the most-affected groups.

Likely helped
  • Potential benefitReduces likelihood of introducing invasive species that damage Hawaii's agriculture and native ecosystems.
  • Potential benefitLowers potential long-term eradication and agricultural damage costs if inspections prevent introductions.
  • Federal agenciesCreates federal inspection jobs and possibly hires at airports, ports, and postal facilities.
Likely burdened
  • Potential burdenIncreased travel and cargo processing times due to added preclearance inspections.
  • Potential burdenAdditional fees passed to travelers, shippers, and mail senders raising transportation costs.
  • Potential burdenOperational and administrative burden on airports, ports, and USPS to host inspections.
03 · Why people split

Why the argument around this bill splits.

Environmental protection urgency versus perceived federal regulatory overreach
Progressive85%

Generally supportive because stricter preclearance can protect Hawaii’s unique ecosystems, agriculture, and culturally important species.

Concerned about equitable implementation, fee impacts on low-income travelers and small producers, and the need for community consultation and civil liberties safeguards.

Will push for fee exemptions, transparency, and worker protections for inspection staff.

Leans supportive
Centrist65%

Cautiously positive: sees clear biosecurity benefits and economic rationale but wants pragmatic safeguards.

Main concerns are operational feasibility, clear cost-recovery rules, minimal travel and mail disruption, and measurable performance metrics.

Likely to favor phased implementation and intergovernmental coordination.

Split reaction
Conservative25%

Skeptical or opposed: views the bill as federal expansion into interstate movement and travel, risking higher costs for consumers and businesses.

Raises constitutional and commerce-clause concerns, plus tourism and mail disruption.

Prefers limiting federal intrusion and ensuring Hawaii or its travelers bear costs.

Likely resistant
04 · Can it pass?

The path through Congress.

Introduced

Reached or meaningfully advanced

Committee

Reached or meaningfully advanced

Floor

Still ahead

President

Still ahead

Law

Still ahead

Passage likelihood40/100

Technocratic, narrowly targeted measure with fee offset improves prospects, but operational burdens and stakeholder resistance reduce likelihood.

Scope and complexity
52%
Scopemoderate
24%
Complexitylow
Why this could stall
  • No formal cost estimate or CBO score in text
  • Level of opposition from airlines, shippers, and USPS
05 · Recent votes

Recent votes on the bill.

No vote history yet

The bill has not accumulated any surfaced votes yet.

06 · Go deeper

Go deeper than the headline read.

Included on this page

Environmental protection urgency versus perceived federal regulatory overreach

Technocratic, narrowly targeted measure with fee offset improves prospects, but operational burdens and stakeholder resistance reduce likel…

Unlocked analysis

Relative to its intended legislative type, this bill creates substantive legal obligations and fee authorities to establish a Hawaii-focused preclearance inspection regime and integrates those requirements into existing…

Go beyond the headline summary with full stakeholder mapping, legislative design analysis, passage barriers, and lens-by-lens tradeoff breakdowns.

Perspective breakdownsPassage barriersLegislative design reviewStakeholder impact map
Open full analysis