ASSUMING FIRST SPONSORSHIP - Mr. Walkinshaw asked unanimous consent that he may hereafter be considered as the first sponsor of H.R. 493, a bill originally introduced by Represent…
H.R. 493 (FAIR Act) would raise federal pay for calendar year 2026 by adjusting statutory basic pay by 3.3 percent and increasing locality pay by 1 percent. It directs a 3.3 percent increase for prevailing rate (wage‑grade) employees for FY2026 and waives the usual wage survey requirement for that increase.
Liberals emphasize worker pay and equity benefits.
Relative to its intended legislative type, this bill is a narrowly scoped substantive pay-adjustment measure that is precise about the adjustments and their statutory anchors but sparse on fiscal, edge-case, and oversight detail.
H.R. 493 (FAIR Act) would raise federal pay for calendar year 2026 by adjusting statutory basic pay by 3.3 percent and increasing locality pay by 1 percent.
It directs a 3.3 percent increase for prevailing rate (wage‑grade) employees for FY2026 and waives the usual wage survey requirement for that increase.
The changes apply to rates set under title 5 statutory pay and prevailing rate provisions and are limited to the 2026 pay adjustments.
Narrow, routine federal pay adjustment with modest fiscal impact; commonly enacted or incorporated into larger must‑pass measures, though fiscal objections could slow it.
Relative to its intended legislative type, this bill is a narrowly scoped substantive pay-adjustment measure that is precise about the adjustments and their statutory anchors but sparse on fiscal, edge-case, and oversight detail.
Liberals emphasize worker pay and equity benefits.
These are examples from the analysis, not a ranked list of the most-affected groups.
Liberals emphasize worker pay and equity benefits.
This persona would generally welcome the bill as a modest, across-the-board pay increase for federal employees that helps restore purchasing power.
They would note inclusion of prevailing rate employees and the combined 4.3% effect for locality‑adjusted pay as broadly positive for workforce equity and retention.
A centrist would view the bill as a pragmatic, modest raise that addresses pay and retention concerns, while wanting more fiscal detail.
They would be cautiously supportive if cost estimates and procedural safeguards accompany the proposal.
This persona would likely oppose the bill as an unfunded increase in federal compensation that expands spending without offsets.
Some conservatives might accept a small raise if fully offset, but generally they emphasize fiscal restraint and market alignment.
Reached or meaningfully advanced
Still ahead
Still ahead
Still ahead
Still ahead
Narrow, routine federal pay adjustment with modest fiscal impact; commonly enacted or incorporated into larger must‑pass measures, though fiscal objections could slow it.
The bill has not accumulated any surfaced votes yet.
Liberals emphasize worker pay and equity benefits.
Narrow, routine federal pay adjustment with modest fiscal impact; commonly enacted or incorporated into larger must‑pass measures, though f…
Relative to its intended legislative type, this bill is a narrowly scoped substantive pay-adjustment measure that is precise about the adjustments and their statutory anchors but sparse on fiscal, edge-case, and oversig…
Go beyond the headline summary with full stakeholder mapping, legislative design analysis, passage barriers, and lens-by-lens tradeoff breakdowns.