H.R. 499 (119th)Bill Overview

To rename the medical center of the Department of Veterans Affairs in Dallas, Texas, as the "Eddie Bernice Johnson VA Medical Center".

Armed Forces and National Security|Armed Forces and National SecurityCongressional tributes
Cosponsors
Support
Democratic
Introduced
Jan 16, 2025
Discussions
Bill Text
Current stageCommittee

Referred to the House Committee on Veterans' Affairs.

Introduced
Committee
Floor
President
Law
Congressional Activities
01 · The brief
Plain-English summaryWhat this bill actually does

This bill renames the Department of Veterans Affairs medical center located at 4500 South Lancaster Road, Dallas, Texas, as the "Eddie Bernice Johnson VA Medical Center." It includes findings describing Eddie Bernice Johnson’s service as a VA psychiatric nurse and thirty years in Congress, including veteran-related legislation she sponsored. The bill directs that any federal references to the facility be considered references to the new name.

Why people may split

Liberal emphasizes representation and honoring veterans' advocate.

Watch point

Relative to its intended legislative type, this bill is a concise and well-formed commemorative naming statute: it clearly sets out findings, specifies the exact new names, identifies the facility by address, and includes a clause to treat existing references as referencing the new name.

This bill renames the Department of Veterans Affairs medical center located at 4500 South Lancaster Road, Dallas, Texas, as the "Eddie Bernice Johnson VA Medical Center." It includes findings describing Eddie Bernice Johnson’s service as a VA psychiatric nurse and thirty years in Congress, including veteran-related legislation she sponsored.

The bill directs that any federal references to the facility be considered references to the new name.

It does not change operations, funding, or services.

Passage85/100

Narrow, symbolic renaming with minimal fiscal or regulatory impact historically moves easily through both chambers absent local controversy.

CredibilityAligned

Relative to its intended legislative type, this bill is a concise and well-formed commemorative naming statute: it clearly sets out findings, specifies the exact new names, identifies the facility by address, and includes a clause to treat existing references as referencing the new name.

Contention18/100

Liberal emphasizes representation and honoring veterans' advocate.

02 · What it does

Who stands to gain, and who may push back.

Likely benefits vs burdens50% / 50%
Veterans · Local governmentsFederal agencies

These are examples from the analysis, not a ranked list of the most-affected groups.

Likely helped
  • VeteransFormally honors Eddie Bernice Johnson’s service and contributions to veterans.
  • Local governmentsMay increase local pride and morale among staff and veterans served.
  • Potential benefitCreates a clear, single name for legal and administrative references.
Likely burdened
  • Potential burdenRequires spending to update signage, stationery, websites, and maps.
  • Federal agenciesImposes administrative work to change federal records and databases.
  • Federal agenciesEstablishes precedent for naming federal facilities after individual officeholders.
03 · Why people split

Why the argument around this bill splits.

Liberal emphasizes representation and honoring veterans' advocate.
Progressive95%

Likely strongly supportive.

The bill honors a Black woman veteran advocate and longtime Congresswoman who worked for veterans' care.

It is a symbolic recognition of service and representation for Dallas veterans.

Leans supportive
Centrist80%

Generally supportive but pragmatic.

Renaming is a routine, primarily symbolic congressional action with modest administrative effects.

Concerned about precedent, costs, and ensuring local and bipartisan buy-in.

Leans supportive
Conservative60%

Mixed to somewhat supportive.

Some conservatives will accept honoring a veteran-focused public servant; others will worry about politicizing federal property and precedent for naming after living or partisan figures.

Split reaction
04 · Can it pass?

The path through Congress.

Introduced

Reached or meaningfully advanced

Committee

Reached or meaningfully advanced

Floor

Still ahead

President

Still ahead

Law

Still ahead

Passage likelihood85/100

Narrow, symbolic renaming with minimal fiscal or regulatory impact historically moves easily through both chambers absent local controversy.

Scope and complexity
24%
Scopenarrow
24%
Complexitylow
Why this could stall
  • No official cost estimate or implementation timeline provided
  • Potential, though unlikely, local or stakeholder objections to the name
05 · Recent votes

Recent votes on the bill.

No vote history yet

The bill has not accumulated any surfaced votes yet.

06 · Go deeper

Go deeper than the headline read.

Included on this page

Liberal emphasizes representation and honoring veterans' advocate.

Narrow, symbolic renaming with minimal fiscal or regulatory impact historically moves easily through both chambers absent local controversy.

Unlocked analysis

Relative to its intended legislative type, this bill is a concise and well-formed commemorative naming statute: it clearly sets out findings, specifies the exact new names, identifies the facility by address, and includ…

Go beyond the headline summary with full stakeholder mapping, legislative design analysis, passage barriers, and lens-by-lens tradeoff breakdowns.

Perspective breakdownsPassage barriersLegislative design reviewStakeholder impact map
Open full analysis