Referred to the Committee on Energy and Commerce, and in addition to the Committee on Agriculture, for a period to be subsequently determined by the Speaker, in each case for cons…
Creates the Inspection and Consumption of Shrimp and Shrimp Products Fund. The Treasury will transfer amounts equal to 70% of duties attributable to specified shrimp import tariff lines into the Fund beginning fiscal year 2026.
Liberals emphasize public-health and forced-labor enforcement benefits.
Relative to its intended legislative type, this bill establishes a clear substantive change—a permanent Treasury fund funded by a defined share of import-duty-attributable receipts and allocated to specific FDA inspection and USDA consumption-promotion activities—with reasonably specific mechanisms and statutory cross-references, but with limited fiscal and oversight scaffolding.
Creates the Inspection and Consumption of Shrimp and Shrimp Products Fund.
The Treasury will transfer amounts equal to 70% of duties attributable to specified shrimp import tariff lines into the Fund beginning fiscal year 2026.
Fifty percent of Fund money goes to HHS/FDA for shrimp inspection, antibiotic residue testing, importer inspections, training, data analytics, and interagency coordination on forced-labor and IUU risks; fifty percent goes to USDA to encourage domestic shrimp consumption under Section 32.
Modest chance: narrow, administrable, and industry-friendly but redirects tariff revenue and creates new programmatic spending that can trigger fiscal objections.
Relative to its intended legislative type, this bill establishes a clear substantive change—a permanent Treasury fund funded by a defined share of import-duty-attributable receipts and allocated to specific FDA inspection and USDA consumption-promotion activities—with reasonably specific mechanisms and statutory cross-references, but with limited fiscal and oversight scaffolding.
Liberals emphasize public-health and forced-labor enforcement benefits.
These are examples from the analysis, not a ranked list of the most-affected groups.
Liberals emphasize public-health and forced-labor enforcement benefits.
Likely supportive of stronger food safety and forced-labor enforcement funding.
Concerned about promoting increased shrimp consumption without environmental and labor safeguards.
Wants transparency, sustainability criteria, and anti-labor-abuse enforcement in implementation.
Sees practical benefits in targeted inspection funding and forced-labor enforcement.
Wary of revenue diversion, trade impacts, and market distortion from government promotion.
Would favor oversight, measurable outcomes, and limited sunset or review provisions.
Skeptical of diverting tariff receipts and creating a dedicated federal fund to promote a specific commodity.
Concerned about expanded federal intervention, market distortion, and new recurring spending.
May support forced-labor enforcement but opposes program structure.
Reached or meaningfully advanced
Reached or meaningfully advanced
Still ahead
Still ahead
Still ahead
Modest chance: narrow, administrable, and industry-friendly but redirects tariff revenue and creates new programmatic spending that can trigger fiscal objections.
The bill has not accumulated any surfaced votes yet.
Liberals emphasize public-health and forced-labor enforcement benefits.
Modest chance: narrow, administrable, and industry-friendly but redirects tariff revenue and creates new programmatic spending that can tri…
Relative to its intended legislative type, this bill establishes a clear substantive change—a permanent Treasury fund funded by a defined share of import-duty-attributable receipts and allocated to specific FDA inspecti…
Go beyond the headline summary with full stakeholder mapping, legislative design analysis, passage barriers, and lens-by-lens tradeoff breakdowns.