H.R. 5200 (119th)Bill Overview

Emergency Reporting Act

Science, Technology, Communications|Congressional oversightElectric power generation and transmission
Cosponsors
Support
Lean Democratic
Introduced
Sep 8, 2025
Discussions
Bill Text
Current stageCommittee

Received in the Senate. Read twice. Placed on Senate Legislative Calendar under General Orders. Calendar No. 375.

Introduced
Committee
Floor
President
Law
Congressional Activities
01 · The brief
Plain-English summaryWhat this bill actually does

The Emergency Reporting Act directs the Federal Communications Commission (FCC) to hold annual public hearings after significant activations of its Disaster Information Reporting System and to produce timely public reports on communications outages, impacts, and resilience recommendations. It also requires the FCC to investigate improving outage notifications to emergency communications centers, including the potential value and burden of adding visual information, and to recommend rule changes.

Why people may split

Progressives emphasize public-safety transparency and equity benefits

Watch point

Relative to its intended legislative type, this bill is a well-constructed study/reporting measure that specifies responsible entity, schedules, report content, publication, and relevant legal definitions, while also integrating with existing FCC systems and regulations.

The Emergency Reporting Act directs the Federal Communications Commission (FCC) to hold annual public hearings after significant activations of its Disaster Information Reporting System and to produce timely public reports on communications outages, impacts, and resilience recommendations.

It also requires the FCC to investigate improving outage notifications to emergency communications centers, including the potential value and burden of adding visual information, and to recommend rule changes.

The Act limits new authority to what is explicitly provided and defines key terms.

Passage60/100

Narrow, technocratic bill with low fiscal impact historically favored for enactment, but still requires Senate approval and signature.

CredibilityPartially aligned

Relative to its intended legislative type, this bill is a well-constructed study/reporting measure that specifies responsible entity, schedules, report content, publication, and relevant legal definitions, while also integrating with existing FCC systems and regulations.

Contention70/100

Progressives emphasize public-safety transparency and equity benefits

02 · What it does

Who stands to gain, and who may push back.

Likely benefits vs burdens50% / 50%
Local governmentsLikely burdened

These are examples from the analysis, not a ranked list of the most-affected groups.

Likely helped
  • Potential benefitIncreased transparency on outage scope and duration aiding emergency planning.
  • Local governmentsPublic hearings engage local officials, first responders, and consumers for actionable feedback.
  • Potential benefitReports and recommendations may prompt investments to strengthen network resilience.
Likely burdened
  • Potential burdenAdditional reporting, hearings, and investigatory tasks increase compliance costs for communications providers.
  • Potential burdenMandated visual outage data may impose technical and privacy challenges for providers.
  • Potential burdenPublic reports risk revealing sensitive infrastructure details despite confidentiality exceptions.
Congressional Budget Office

CBO cost estimate

The clearest budget scorecard attached to this bill: what it changes for direct spending, revenue, and the deficit.

As ordered reported by the House Committee on Energy and Commerce on January 21, 2026

03 · Why people split

Why the argument around this bill splits.

Progressives emphasize public-safety transparency and equity benefits
Progressive85%

Likely supportive overall.

The bill increases transparency, accountability, and data collection about outage impacts on communities and 9‑1‑1 systems, which aligns with priorities for public safety and equitable emergency response.

Concerns would focus on ensuring robust follow-through, privacy protections, and resources for underserved areas.

Leans supportive
Centrist65%

Generally favorable but pragmatic.

The measure promotes oversight and useful data without immediate heavy-handed regulation.

The centrist view will weigh benefits against compliance costs and seek clear timelines, cost estimates, and protections for confidential business information.

Split reaction
Conservative30%

Skeptical.

While acknowledging public-safety intent, this persona worries the bill increases regulatory burden on communications providers and risks mission creep by the FCC despite the rule-of-construction language.

Emphasis will be on limiting new obligations and protecting proprietary information.

Likely resistant
04 · Can it pass?

The path through Congress.

Introduced

Reached or meaningfully advanced

Committee

Reached or meaningfully advanced

Floor

Still ahead

President

Still ahead

Law

Still ahead

Passage likelihood60/100

Narrow, technocratic bill with low fiscal impact historically favored for enactment, but still requires Senate approval and signature.

Scope and complexity
24%
Scopenarrow
24%
Complexitylow
Why this could stall
  • Absence of cost estimate for FCC implementation
  • Telecom provider pushback over added notification burdens
05 · Recent votes

Recent votes on the bill.

HOUSE · Apr 20, 2026
Fast-track passage✓ PassedBipartisanNear-unanimous
2/3 majority required

The House fast-tracked this bill — skipping normal debate — and it passed with a two-thirds majority. It now moves to the Senate.

What is a fast-track passage?

Suspending the rules allows the House to bypass normal debate procedures and pass a bill immediately with a two-thirds vote.

Yes 98% No 2%
Against party line
Showing a quick cross-section of legislators, with followed members first when available.
06 · Go deeper

Go deeper than the headline read.

Included on this page

Progressives emphasize public-safety transparency and equity benefits

Narrow, technocratic bill with low fiscal impact historically favored for enactment, but still requires Senate approval and signature.

Unlocked analysis

Relative to its intended legislative type, this bill is a well-constructed study/reporting measure that specifies responsible entity, schedules, report content, publication, and relevant legal definitions, while also in…

Go beyond the headline summary with full stakeholder mapping, legislative design analysis, passage barriers, and lens-by-lens tradeoff breakdowns.

Perspective breakdownsPassage barriersLegislative design reviewStakeholder impact map
Open full analysis