Referred to the Committee on House Administration, and in addition to the Committee on Oversight and Government Reform, for a period to be subsequently determined by the Speaker,…
The Inaugural Fund Integrity Act amends the Federal Election Campaign Act to restrict donations and increase disclosure for Presidential Inaugural Committees. It bars committees from soliciting or accepting donations from non-individuals and foreign nationals, prohibits straw donations and conversion of funds to personal use, and limits individual aggregate giving to $50,000 (indexed beginning 2032).
Progressives emphasize anti-corruption and transparency benefits.
Relative to its intended legislative type, this bill sets substantive new legal rules for Inaugural Committees with reasonably clear limits, definitions, reporting requirements, and integration into existing statutes, but it does not fully specify enforcement remedies or resource implications.
The Inaugural Fund Integrity Act amends the Federal Election Campaign Act to restrict donations and increase disclosure for Presidential Inaugural Committees.
It bars committees from soliciting or accepting donations from non-individuals and foreign nationals, prohibits straw donations and conversion of funds to personal use, and limits individual aggregate giving to $50,000 (indexed beginning 2032).
The bill requires 24-hour reporting for donations of $1,000 or more and a detailed final report within 90 days after the inauguration listing donations and disbursements of $200 or more.
Technocratic, targeted reforms increase plausibility, but donation caps and reporting burdens create political and legal friction reducing odds.
Relative to its intended legislative type, this bill sets substantive new legal rules for Inaugural Committees with reasonably clear limits, definitions, reporting requirements, and integration into existing statutes, but it does not fully specify enforcement remedies or resource implications.
Progressives emphasize anti-corruption and transparency benefits.
These are examples from the analysis, not a ranked list of the most-affected groups.
Progressives emphasize anti-corruption and transparency benefits.
Likely broadly supportive because the bill reduces corporate and foreign influence and strengthens transparency.
Progressives will welcome limits on big individual checks and rules against personal conversion, though some will wish for even lower caps and stronger anti-circumvention rules.
Generally favorable as a pragmatic anti-corruption and disclosure measure, while recognizing tradeoffs.
Supports the foreign-national ban and reporting rules but will seek clarity on administrative burden, enforceability, and cost-benefit balance.
Likely skeptical or opposed because the bill restricts non-individual donations and expands federal reporting requirements.
While supportive of banning foreign-national donations, conservatives will view corporate/entity bans and detailed donor disclosure as unnecessary federal overreach and a potential chill on political association.
Reached or meaningfully advanced
Reached or meaningfully advanced
Still ahead
Still ahead
Still ahead
Technocratic, targeted reforms increase plausibility, but donation caps and reporting burdens create political and legal friction reducing odds.
The bill has not accumulated any surfaced votes yet.
Progressives emphasize anti-corruption and transparency benefits.
Technocratic, targeted reforms increase plausibility, but donation caps and reporting burdens create political and legal friction reducing…
Relative to its intended legislative type, this bill sets substantive new legal rules for Inaugural Committees with reasonably clear limits, definitions, reporting requirements, and integration into existing statutes, b…
Go beyond the headline summary with full stakeholder mapping, legislative design analysis, passage barriers, and lens-by-lens tradeoff breakdowns.