H.R. 558 (119th)Bill Overview

Tip Tax Termination Act

Taxation|Taxation
Sponsor
Cosponsors
Support
Republican
Introduced
Jan 20, 2025
Discussions
Bill Text
Current stageCommittee

Referred to the House Committee on Ways and Means.

Introduced
Committee
Floor
President
Law
Congressional Activities
01 · The brief
Plain-English summaryWhat this bill actually does

The Tip Tax Termination Act amends the Internal Revenue Code to exclude up to $20,000 of "eligible tips" from gross income for individuals for tax years from 2025 through 2029. Eligible tips cover work that generally relies on tips, such as cosmetology, hospitality, and food service.

Why people may split

Left emphasizes worker income and CTC/EIC benefits

Watch point

Relative to its intended legislative type, this bill is a straightforward statutory insertion creating a temporary exclusion for certain tips with basic structural elements (amount cap, eligible categories, denial-of-double-benefit, sunset, clerical amendments, and a withholding-direction).

The Tip Tax Termination Act amends the Internal Revenue Code to exclude up to $20,000 of "eligible tips" from gross income for individuals for tax years from 2025 through 2029.

Eligible tips cover work that generally relies on tips, such as cosmetology, hospitality, and food service.

The excluded tip amount is disallowed for most deductions and credits, but is counted for the child tax credit and the earned income credit.

Passage30/100

Narrow, non-ideological tax break helps chances, but fiscal cost, lack of offsets, and Senate hurdles lower odds absent broader package inclusion.

CredibilityPartially aligned

Relative to its intended legislative type, this bill is a straightforward statutory insertion creating a temporary exclusion for certain tips with basic structural elements (amount cap, eligible categories, denial-of-double-benefit, sunset, clerical amendments, and a withholding-direction). It is specific enough to establish the core policy change but leaves many practical and fiscal details to implementing guidance or other processes.

Contention55/100

Left emphasizes worker income and CTC/EIC benefits

02 · What it does

Who stands to gain, and who may push back.

Likely benefits vs burdens50% / 50%
Federal agencies · Local governmentsFederal agencies · Workers

These are examples from the analysis, not a ranked list of the most-affected groups.

Likely helped
  • Federal agenciesReduces federal income tax liability for eligible tipped workers by excluding up to $20,000 of tips annually.
  • Local governmentsIncreases disposable income for workers, which may boost local consumer spending and demand.
  • Federal agenciesSimplifies federal income-tax reporting for many tipped employees by removing a large portion of tip income.
Likely burdened
  • Federal agenciesReduces federal income tax revenue, increasing the budget deficit or pressure to cut spending.
  • Potential burdenCreates incentives for greater underreporting of tips, complicating tax enforcement and compliance.
  • WorkersBenefits may be uneven, favoring higher-tip workers and not aiding non-tipped low-income employees.
03 · Why people split

Why the argument around this bill splits.

Left emphasizes worker income and CTC/EIC benefits
Progressive85%

Likely broadly supportive because the bill raises after-tax income for many low-paid tipped workers and preserves CTC/EIC eligibility.

Would prefer permanence, stronger safeguards, and clarity on payroll tax treatment and enforcement to protect workers.

Leans supportive
Centrist55%

Cautiously receptive: supports targeted tax relief for lower-income workers but worries about budgetary cost, administrative complexity, and benefiting some higher-earning tipped workers.

Would want offsets or limited scope and data collection to evaluate effects.

Split reaction
Conservative35%

Mixed to skeptical: favors tax relief in principle but opposes special carve-outs that shrink the tax base and complicate rules.

Concerned about fraud, higher-income tipped workers receiving the benefit, and insufficient fiscal offsets.

Likely resistant
04 · Can it pass?

The path through Congress.

Introduced

Reached or meaningfully advanced

Committee

Reached or meaningfully advanced

Floor

Still ahead

President

Still ahead

Law

Still ahead

Passage likelihood30/100

Narrow, non-ideological tax break helps chances, but fiscal cost, lack of offsets, and Senate hurdles lower odds absent broader package inclusion.

Scope and complexity
24%
Scopenarrow
24%
Complexitylow
Why this could stall
  • No CBO/score in text to show revenue cost
  • Level of committee and floor support unspecified
05 · Recent votes

Recent votes on the bill.

No vote history yet

The bill has not accumulated any surfaced votes yet.

06 · Go deeper

Go deeper than the headline read.

Included on this page

Left emphasizes worker income and CTC/EIC benefits

Narrow, non-ideological tax break helps chances, but fiscal cost, lack of offsets, and Senate hurdles lower odds absent broader package inc…

Unlocked analysis

Relative to its intended legislative type, this bill is a straightforward statutory insertion creating a temporary exclusion for certain tips with basic structural elements (amount cap, eligible categories, denial-of-do…

Go beyond the headline summary with full stakeholder mapping, legislative design analysis, passage barriers, and lens-by-lens tradeoff breakdowns.

Perspective breakdownsPassage barriersLegislative design reviewStakeholder impact map
Open full analysis