H.R. 561 (119th)Bill Overview

Overtime Pay Tax Relief Act of 2025

Taxation|Taxation
Sponsor
Cosponsors
Support
Republican
Introduced
Jan 20, 2025
Discussions
Bill Text
Current stageCommittee

Referred to the House Committee on Ways and Means.

Introduced
Committee
Floor
President
Law
Congressional Activities
01 · The brief
Plain-English summaryWhat this bill actually does

This bill creates a new federal income tax deduction for overtime compensation that is equal to overtime pay up to 20% of an individual’s other wages from the same employer in the taxable year. The deduction is available to non-itemizers, excludes taxpayers above specified adjusted gross income thresholds, requires updates to withholding tables, and automatically expires after December 31, 2029.

Why people may split

Left stresses labor enforcement over tax relief

Watch point

Relative to its intended legislative type, this bill is a straightforward statutory modification establishing a new temporary individual tax deduction for certain overtime compensation and includes necessary conforming amendments to the Internal Revenue Code and a directive to update withholding procedures.

This bill creates a new federal income tax deduction for overtime compensation that is equal to overtime pay up to 20% of an individual’s other wages from the same employer in the taxable year.

The deduction is available to non-itemizers, excludes taxpayers above specified adjusted gross income thresholds, requires updates to withholding tables, and automatically expires after December 31, 2029.

The amendments take effect for amounts received after enactment.

Passage45/100

Narrow, administrable tax cut with sunset increases feasibility, but revenue impact and lack of offsets reduce prospects, especially in the Senate.

CredibilityPartially aligned

Relative to its intended legislative type, this bill is a straightforward statutory modification establishing a new temporary individual tax deduction for certain overtime compensation and includes necessary conforming amendments to the Internal Revenue Code and a directive to update withholding procedures.

Contention25/100

Left stresses labor enforcement over tax relief

02 · What it does

Who stands to gain, and who may push back.

Likely benefits vs burdens50% / 50%
Workers · Federal agenciesFederal agencies · Workers

These are examples from the analysis, not a ranked list of the most-affected groups.

Likely helped
  • WorkersIncreases after-tax pay for eligible overtime workers, directly raising their take-home income.
  • Federal agenciesMay improve short-term cash flow by reducing federal income tax withholding for eligible employees.
  • WorkersEncourages additional overtime work, potentially increasing labor supply and firm output in overtime-intensive industri…
Likely burdened
  • Federal agenciesReduces federal income tax revenue, increasing projected budget deficits absent offsets.
  • WorkersGives larger absolute benefits to workers in overtime-heavy occupations, potentially creating distributional inequities.
  • WorkersCould incentivize longer work hours, raising risks of worker fatigue, safety incidents, and burnout.
03 · Why people split

Why the argument around this bill splits.

Left stresses labor enforcement over tax relief
Progressive70%

Generally favorable to targeted relief for hourly workers who earn overtime, but cautious.

Would view the deduction as a limited way to boost take-home pay, while preferring stronger labor enforcement or wage policy changes over a tax expenditure.

Leans supportive
Centrist75%

Mildly supportive as targeted, time-limited tax relief for working households.

Sees merit in helping overtime earners but wants clarity on fiscal cost, administrative burden, and labor-market incentives.

Leans supportive
Conservative65%

Cautiously favorable because it lowers income tax on earned overtime and is temporary.

Concerned about targeted tax expenditures, cost, and potential new compliance burdens for employers.

Split reaction
04 · Can it pass?

The path through Congress.

Introduced

Reached or meaningfully advanced

Committee

Reached or meaningfully advanced

Floor

Still ahead

President

Still ahead

Law

Still ahead

Passage likelihood45/100

Narrow, administrable tax cut with sunset increases feasibility, but revenue impact and lack of offsets reduce prospects, especially in the Senate.

Scope and complexity
52%
Scopemoderate
24%
Complexitylow
Why this could stall
  • Estimated revenue cost not provided
  • Whether Congressional pay‑for/offset demands arise
05 · Recent votes

Recent votes on the bill.

No vote history yet

The bill has not accumulated any surfaced votes yet.

06 · Go deeper

Go deeper than the headline read.

Included on this page

Left stresses labor enforcement over tax relief

Narrow, administrable tax cut with sunset increases feasibility, but revenue impact and lack of offsets reduce prospects, especially in the…

Unlocked analysis

Relative to its intended legislative type, this bill is a straightforward statutory modification establishing a new temporary individual tax deduction for certain overtime compensation and includes necessary conforming…

Go beyond the headline summary with full stakeholder mapping, legislative design analysis, passage barriers, and lens-by-lens tradeoff breakdowns.

Perspective breakdownsPassage barriersLegislative design reviewStakeholder impact map
Open full analysis