Referred to the House Committee on the Judiciary.
The bill amends the Immigration and Nationality Act to treat an offense described in 18 U.S.C. §611 (a federal voting offense) committed by an alien who is unlawfully present as an "aggravated felony," and makes such a knowing violation a deportable offense for unlawfully present aliens.
Severity: liberals see aggravated felony as disproportionate; conservatives see appropriate deterrence.
Relative to its intended legislative type, this bill is a concise and targeted statutory amendment that clearly identifies where to insert new immigration consequences tied to an existing federal criminal statute.
The bill amends the Immigration and Nationality Act to treat an offense described in 18 U.S.C. §611 (a federal voting offense) committed by an alien who is unlawfully present as an "aggravated felony," and makes such a knowing violation a deportable offense for unlawfully present aliens.
Narrow statutory change but high political controversy, likely opposition, potential legal challenges, and Senate hurdles reduce prospects.
Relative to its intended legislative type, this bill is a concise and targeted statutory amendment that clearly identifies where to insert new immigration consequences tied to an existing federal criminal statute. Its construction is precise in statutory citation and placement but sparse on implementation detail, fiscal acknowledgment, edge-case handling, and accountability mechanisms.
Severity: liberals see aggravated felony as disproportionate; conservatives see appropriate deterrence.
These are examples from the analysis, not a ranked list of the most-affected groups.
Severity: liberals see aggravated felony as disproportionate; conservatives see appropriate deterrence.
Likely opposed.
The provision converts a federal voting offense by an unlawfully present alien into an aggravated felony with deportation consequences.
Progressives will view this as an excessively harsh immigration penalty for a voting-related offense and worry about chilling effects and due-process risks.
Mixed.
Supports protecting election integrity but concerned the aggravated-felony classification is severe and may cause unintended harms.
Would look for narrower language and procedural safeguards to reduce overreach and administrative burden.
Generally supportive.
Views the bill as strengthening enforcement against illegal voting and protecting the integrity of federal elections by attaching severe immigration consequences to such violations.
Reached or meaningfully advanced
Reached or meaningfully advanced
Still ahead
Still ahead
Still ahead
Narrow statutory change but high political controversy, likely opposition, potential legal challenges, and Senate hurdles reduce prospects.
The bill has not accumulated any surfaced votes yet.
Severity: liberals see aggravated felony as disproportionate; conservatives see appropriate deterrence.
Narrow statutory change but high political controversy, likely opposition, potential legal challenges, and Senate hurdles reduce prospects.
Relative to its intended legislative type, this bill is a concise and targeted statutory amendment that clearly identifies where to insert new immigration consequences tied to an existing federal criminal statute. Its c…
Go beyond the headline summary with full stakeholder mapping, legislative design analysis, passage barriers, and lens-by-lens tradeoff breakdowns.