H.R. 6030 (119th)Bill Overview

Puerto Rico Substance Use and Health Data Collection Act

Health|Health
Cosponsors
Support
Democratic
Introduced
Nov 12, 2025
Discussions
Bill Text
Current stageCommittee

Referred to the House Committee on Energy and Commerce.

Introduced
Committee
Floor
President
Law
Congressional Activities
01 · The brief
Plain-English summaryWhat this bill actually does

This bill amends section 505(d) of the Public Health Service Act to require that annual surveys carried out under that section include Puerto Rico beginning in fiscal year 2026. In practice, it directs that Puerto Rico be added to the National Survey on Drug Use and Health (NSDUH) annual data collection.

Why people may split

Magnitude of concern about fiscal impact and whether Congress must appropriate new funds (centrist and conservative more worried; liberal less so).

Watch point

Relative to its intended legislative type, this bill is a narrowly scoped statutory amendment that clearly and directly requires inclusion of Puerto Rico in the annual surveys governed by 42 U.S.C. 290aa–4(d) beginning in FY2026.

This bill amends section 505(d) of the Public Health Service Act to require that annual surveys carried out under that section include Puerto Rico beginning in fiscal year 2026.

In practice, it directs that Puerto Rico be added to the National Survey on Drug Use and Health (NSDUH) annual data collection.

The statutory change is limited to inclusion in the survey and does not specify additional funding, survey methodology details, or data use.

Passage65/100

On content alone, the bill is a small, non-ideological technical change that addresses a data gap and is the type of measure that commonly succeeds. Its lack of controversial policy content and modest fiscal implications increase its chances. However, it depends on committee prioritization, potential objections about costs or implementation, and whether implementing funds or technical adjustments are later required, which reduces certainty.

CredibilityPartially aligned

Relative to its intended legislative type, this bill is a narrowly scoped statutory amendment that clearly and directly requires inclusion of Puerto Rico in the annual surveys governed by 42 U.S.C. 290aa–4(d) beginning in FY2026.

Contention25/100

Magnitude of concern about fiscal impact and whether Congress must appropriate new funds (centrist and conservative more worried; liberal less so).

02 · What it does

Who stands to gain, and who may push back.

Likely benefits vs burdens50% / 50%
Federal agencies · Local governmentsFederal agencies · Local governments

These are examples from the analysis, not a ranked list of the most-affected groups.

Likely helped
  • Federal agenciesProvides the first consistent, comparable federal data on substance use and mental health in Puerto Rico, enabling bett…
  • Local governmentsImproves ability to target federal and local treatment and prevention resources, inform needs assessments, and support…
  • Local governmentsGenerates new opportunities for local survey administration, data collection, and analytic work in Puerto Rico (tempora…
Likely burdened
  • Federal agenciesIncreases federal program costs to expand survey coverage (sampling, translation, fieldwork and analysis); the overall…
  • Local governmentsRaises data-privacy and confidentiality concerns among respondents and local stakeholders about collection, storage, an…
  • Potential burdenIntroduces logistical and methodological challenges (language translation, cultural adaptation, sampling frame coverage…
03 · Why people split

Why the argument around this bill splits.

Magnitude of concern about fiscal impact and whether Congress must appropriate new funds (centrist and conservative more worried; liberal less so).
Progressive95%

Supportive.

This persona will view the bill as a necessary step toward data equity and better public-health planning for Puerto Rico.

Including Puerto Rico in the NSDUH fills a long-standing information gap that can reveal unmet treatment needs, support federal program eligibility decisions, and guide targeted prevention and harm-reduction efforts.

Leans supportive
Centrist80%

Generally favorable but pragmatic.

This persona will see the bill as a reasonable, narrowly tailored statutory fix to close a data gap, but will want clarity on costs, operational feasibility, and expected benefits.

They will look for evidence that adding Puerto Rico can be done without undermining the quality of the national survey and will expect a cost estimate and implementation plan.

Leans supportive
Conservative50%

Cautious / mixed.

This persona may not oppose the principle of including Puerto Rico in a national health survey but will be attentive to costs, federal overreach, and whether the measure requires new appropriations.

Some conservatives could view this as a modest, administratively straightforward change; others will request assurance that this will not be a backdoor expansion of federal programs without clear benefits.

Split reaction
04 · Can it pass?

The path through Congress.

Introduced

Reached or meaningfully advanced

Committee

Reached or meaningfully advanced

Floor

Still ahead

President

Still ahead

Law

Still ahead

Passage likelihood65/100

On content alone, the bill is a small, non-ideological technical change that addresses a data gap and is the type of measure that commonly succeeds. Its lack of controversial policy content and modest fiscal implications increase its chances. However, it depends on committee prioritization, potential objections about costs or implementation, and whether implementing funds or technical adjustments are later required, which reduces certainty.

Scope and complexity
24%
Scopenarrow
24%
Complexitylow
Why this could stall
  • The bill contains no authorization of appropriations or cost estimate; the availability of funds or whether the administering agency can absorb the incremental cost is unclear.
  • Operational details (sampling design, bilingual instruments, field operations in Puerto Rico, timing) are not specified and could require additional rulemaking, contracts, or intergovernmental coordination.
05 · Recent votes

Recent votes on the bill.

No vote history yet

The bill has not accumulated any surfaced votes yet.

06 · Go deeper

Go deeper than the headline read.

Included on this page

Magnitude of concern about fiscal impact and whether Congress must appropriate new funds (centrist and conservative more worried; liberal l…

On content alone, the bill is a small, non-ideological technical change that addresses a data gap and is the type of measure that commonly…

Unlocked analysis

Relative to its intended legislative type, this bill is a narrowly scoped statutory amendment that clearly and directly requires inclusion of Puerto Rico in the annual surveys governed by 42 U.S.C. 290aa–4(d) beginning…

Go beyond the headline summary with full stakeholder mapping, legislative design analysis, passage barriers, and lens-by-lens tradeoff breakdowns.

Perspective breakdownsPassage barriersLegislative design reviewStakeholder impact map
Open full analysis