Referred to the House Committee on Natural Resources.
This bill repeals Public Land Order No. 7923, which had withdrawn certain public lands around Chaco Culture National Historical Park in San Juan County, New Mexico, from mineral entry. If enacted, the withdrawal would no longer be in effect and those lands could again be subject to mineral entry and related federal leasing or permitting processes.
Cultural preservation vs resource development priorities
Relative to its intended legislative type, this bill is a concise and narrowly targeted substantive change that clearly identifies the specific Public Land Order to be nullified but provides minimal implementation detail, fiscal acknowledgement, or integration with existing statutory and administrative frameworks.
This bill repeals Public Land Order No. 7923, which had withdrawn certain public lands around Chaco Culture National Historical Park in San Juan County, New Mexico, from mineral entry.
If enacted, the withdrawal would no longer be in effect and those lands could again be subject to mineral entry and related federal leasing or permitting processes.
The bill contains no implementing provisions, conditions, or new regulatory requirements.
Very narrow but politically sensitive rollback of a conservation-oriented withdrawal; likely to meet strong stakeholder and executive resistance despite limited fiscal impact.
Relative to its intended legislative type, this bill is a concise and narrowly targeted substantive change that clearly identifies the specific Public Land Order to be nullified but provides minimal implementation detail, fiscal acknowledgement, or integration with existing statutory and administrative frameworks.
Cultural preservation vs resource development priorities
These are examples from the analysis, not a ranked list of the most-affected groups.
Cultural preservation vs resource development priorities
Likely opposed.
Supporters of cultural preservation and environmental protection will view nullification as a step toward potential resource extraction near a sensitive historic and indigenous site.
They will stress tribal rights, cultural integrity, and climate impacts.
Mixed to cautious.
Sees potential economic gains but worries about cultural, environmental, and legal implications.
Would favor measured, procedural safeguards such as rigorous impact assessments and meaningful tribal consultation before any development.
Likely supportive.
Views the repeal as correcting federal overreach and restoring access to public minerals and economic opportunity.
Emphasizes local control, energy development, and property/mineral rights within existing law.
Reached or meaningfully advanced
Reached or meaningfully advanced
Still ahead
Still ahead
Still ahead
Very narrow but politically sensitive rollback of a conservation-oriented withdrawal; likely to meet strong stakeholder and executive resistance despite limited fiscal impact.
The bill has not accumulated any surfaced votes yet.
Cultural preservation vs resource development priorities
Very narrow but politically sensitive rollback of a conservation-oriented withdrawal; likely to meet strong stakeholder and executive resis…
Relative to its intended legislative type, this bill is a concise and narrowly targeted substantive change that clearly identifies the specific Public Land Order to be nullified but provides minimal implementation detai…
Go beyond the headline summary with full stakeholder mapping, legislative design analysis, passage barriers, and lens-by-lens tradeoff breakdowns.