Referred to the House Committee on the Judiciary.
This bill amends title 36 of the United States Code to add a new chapter designating the composition titled "Here Rests in Honored Glory" by Donald B. Miller as the national hymn of the United States, and updates the table of sections accordingly.
Religious/constitutional concerns: progressives worry about government endorsement of religion; conservatives view religious or faith-linked symbolism as acceptable civic tradition.
Relative to its intended legislative type, this bill is a concise statutory designation adding a national hymn to title 36 and is largely fit-for-purpose as a symbolic/commemorative enactment.
This bill amends title 36 of the United States Code to add a new chapter designating the composition titled "Here Rests in Honored Glory" by Donald B.
Miller as the national hymn of the United States, and updates the table of sections accordingly.
The text is purely declarative and does not appropriate funds or create new federal programs.
Content-wise this is a low-impact, symbolic change that historically would be relatively straightforward to enact if Congress prioritizes it. Pushback is unlikely to come from fiscal or federalism angles, but the religious wording could trigger constitutional objections or political resistance in some quarters. The main practical obstacles are legislative calendar/prioritization and any debate over church/state separation; absent those issues the bill has a fair chance, but those uncertainties lower the score.
Relative to its intended legislative type, this bill is a concise statutory designation adding a national hymn to title 36 and is largely fit-for-purpose as a symbolic/commemorative enactment.
Religious/constitutional concerns: progressives worry about government endorsement of religion; conservatives view religious or faith-linked symbolism as acceptable civic tradition.
These are examples from the analysis, not a ranked list of the most-affected groups.
Religious/constitutional concerns: progressives worry about government endorsement of religion; conservatives view religious or faith-linked symbolism as acceptable civic tradition.
A liberal/left-leaning observer would see this as a symbolic, cultural designation with limited practical effect but would be attentive to whether the hymn contains explicitly religious language.
They would be cautious about government endorsement of a hymn if the lyrics or tradition are sectarian, given concerns about religious liberty and inclusivity.
Because the bill creates no spending or regulatory regime, the primary concern would be precedent and messaging rather than cost.
A centrist/moderate would likely view this as a low-stakes, symbolic change that requires little government action, but would watch for possible constitutional or cultural backlash.
They would weigh respect for traditions and civic ceremony against the importance of government neutrality toward religion.
Because the bill is short, non-budgetary, and narrowly focused, a centrist would be inclined to accept it if it avoids alienating significant constituencies or provoking litigation.
A mainstream conservative would generally welcome a statutory designation of a national hymn as an affirmation of tradition, patriotism, and public ceremony, especially if the hymn aligns with broadly held cultural or religious values.
They would note the bill creates no regulatory or fiscal burdens and simply names a national hymn.
Some conservatives might still prefer that such cultural decisions be non-controversial and supported by tradition or public consensus, but many would view this positively as strengthening national heritage.
Reached or meaningfully advanced
Reached or meaningfully advanced
Still ahead
Still ahead
Still ahead
Content-wise this is a low-impact, symbolic change that historically would be relatively straightforward to enact if Congress prioritizes it. Pushback is unlikely to come from fiscal or federalism angles, but the religious wording could trigger constitutional objections or political resistance in some quarters. The main practical obstacles are legislative calendar/prioritization and any debate over church/state separation; absent those issues the bill has a fair chance, but those uncertainties lower the score.
The bill has not accumulated any surfaced votes yet.
Religious/constitutional concerns: progressives worry about government endorsement of religion; conservatives view religious or faith-linke…
Content-wise this is a low-impact, symbolic change that historically would be relatively straightforward to enact if Congress prioritizes i…
Relative to its intended legislative type, this bill is a concise statutory designation adding a national hymn to title 36 and is largely fit-for-purpose as a symbolic/commemorative enactment.
Go beyond the headline summary with full stakeholder mapping, legislative design analysis, passage barriers, and lens-by-lens tradeoff breakdowns.