Referred to the House Committee on the Judiciary.
This bill amends the Omnibus Crime Control and Safe Streets Act of 1968 to allow grant funds to be used for training, resources, and purchasing containment devices that prevent secondary exposure to fentanyl and other potentially lethal substances for first responders. It adds a new eligible use for existing grant programs rather than creating a standalone new program or specific appropriations.
Left worries about resource diversion to enforcement versus treatment
Relative to its intended legislative type, this bill is a narrowly scoped administrative amendment that cleanly inserts a new permitted use into an existing grant-authority provision to allow training and purchase of containment devices for first responders.
This bill amends the Omnibus Crime Control and Safe Streets Act of 1968 to allow grant funds to be used for training, resources, and purchasing containment devices that prevent secondary exposure to fentanyl and other potentially lethal substances for first responders.
It adds a new eligible use for existing grant programs rather than creating a standalone new program or specific appropriations.
The text is a single, narrow amendment expanding allowable grant purposes.
Very narrow, technical safety measure using existing grant authority; historically such measures have strong bipartisan support.
Relative to its intended legislative type, this bill is a narrowly scoped administrative amendment that cleanly inserts a new permitted use into an existing grant-authority provision to allow training and purchase of containment devices for first responders.
Left worries about resource diversion to enforcement versus treatment
These are examples from the analysis, not a ranked list of the most-affected groups.
Left worries about resource diversion to enforcement versus treatment
Likely supportive of measures that protect first responders' health and safety, while cautious about shifting resources away from treatment and harm-reduction programs.
May seek safeguards to prevent equipment funding from enabling aggressive policing or militarization.
Generally favorable because it is a targeted, pragmatic safety measure using existing grants.
Wants clear definitions, fiscal accountability, and evidence that funded items are effective.
Favorable toward protecting first responders but wary of expanding federal grant eligibility and potential mission creep.
Support likely if federal involvement remains limited and spending remains modest.
Reached or meaningfully advanced
Reached or meaningfully advanced
Still ahead
Still ahead
Still ahead
Very narrow, technical safety measure using existing grant authority; historically such measures have strong bipartisan support.
The bill has not accumulated any surfaced votes yet.
Left worries about resource diversion to enforcement versus treatment
Very narrow, technical safety measure using existing grant authority; historically such measures have strong bipartisan support.
Relative to its intended legislative type, this bill is a narrowly scoped administrative amendment that cleanly inserts a new permitted use into an existing grant-authority provision to allow training and purchase of co…
Go beyond the headline summary with full stakeholder mapping, legislative design analysis, passage barriers, and lens-by-lens tradeoff breakdowns.