Referred to the House Committee on Education and Workforce.
This bill amends section 26 of the Richard B. Russell National School Lunch Act to expand the scope of the Department of Agriculture’s information clearinghouse on hunger and food assistance to include guidance on using trained volunteers and resources that address ways to prevent hunger.
Scope and role of federal government: liberals see federal info support as helpful; conservatives see it as unnecessary expansion.
Relative to its intended legislative type, this bill is a focused statutory amendment that clearly targets an information clearinghouse within the National School Lunch Act, specifying content expansions and extending/increasing authorized funding through FY2032.
This bill amends section 26 of the Richard B.
Russell National School Lunch Act to expand the scope of the Department of Agriculture’s information clearinghouse on hunger and food assistance to include guidance on using trained volunteers and resources that address ways to prevent hunger.
It also extends the clearinghouse’s authorization and increases appropriations: it replaces previously lower funding levels with $750,000 annually for fiscal years 2026 through 2032 (and adjusts the covered authorization period).
Because the bill is narrowly focused, non-controversial, administratively oriented, and carries only modest fiscal implications, it has a relatively high chance of enactment based on content alone. Final outcome will largely depend on legislative scheduling, whether it gains bipartisan cosponsors or a Senate companion, and whether it is attached to a larger must-pass vehicle.
Relative to its intended legislative type, this bill is a focused statutory amendment that clearly targets an information clearinghouse within the National School Lunch Act, specifying content expansions and extending/increasing authorized funding through FY2032. It integrates cleanly into existing law and specifies concrete funding amounts and years.
Scope and role of federal government: liberals see federal info support as helpful; conservatives see it as unnecessary expansion.
These are examples from the analysis, not a ranked list of the most-affected groups.
Scope and role of federal government: liberals see federal info support as helpful; conservatives see it as unnecessary expansion.
A liberal-leaning observer would generally view this bill positively as a modest, targeted federal step to improve access to information, strengthen community-based responses to food insecurity, and emphasize prevention.
They would welcome explicit inclusion of trained volunteers and prevention-focused resources as consistent with broader anti-hunger and social-support strategies.
They would likely want stronger assurances that the clearinghouse reaches underserved communities, is multilingual and culturally competent, and is coupled with adequate outreach and evaluation.
A centrist/moderate would likely see this as a small, pragmatic improvement to an existing USDA resource that preserves federal support for anti-hunger information-sharing without creating large new obligations.
They would appreciate the modest, time-limited funding increase but want clarity on duplication with other USDA or nonprofit efforts and on measurable outcomes.
Overall they would be inclined to support it provided cost and oversight are transparent.
A mainstream conservative would view this as a modest federal program expansion that raises questions about federal scope and effectiveness.
They may accept some limited federal role in information-sharing, but will likely be skeptical of increasing appropriations and prefer state, local, and private-sector-led solutions.
Concerns would focus on potential mission creep, federal bureaucracy, and whether taxpayer funds are the best instrument for these aims.
Reached or meaningfully advanced
Reached or meaningfully advanced
Still ahead
Still ahead
Still ahead
Because the bill is narrowly focused, non-controversial, administratively oriented, and carries only modest fiscal implications, it has a relatively high chance of enactment based on content alone. Final outcome will largely depend on legislative scheduling, whether it gains bipartisan cosponsors or a Senate companion, and whether it is attached to a larger must-pass vehicle.
The bill has not accumulated any surfaced votes yet.
Scope and role of federal government: liberals see federal info support as helpful; conservatives see it as unnecessary expansion.
Because the bill is narrowly focused, non-controversial, administratively oriented, and carries only modest fiscal implications, it has a r…
Relative to its intended legislative type, this bill is a focused statutory amendment that clearly targets an information clearinghouse within the National School Lunch Act, specifying content expansions and extending/i…
Go beyond the headline summary with full stakeholder mapping, legislative design analysis, passage barriers, and lens-by-lens tradeoff breakdowns.