Referred to the House Committee on Education and Workforce.
This bill directs the Director of the Office of Management and Budget to reclassify public safety telecommunicators as a "protective service occupation" in the Standard Occupational Classification (SOC) system, and requires that change to occur within 30 days of enactment. The text frames the change as correcting an inaccurate representation and aligning SOC classifications with the nature of 9-1-1 telecommunicators’ duties.
Liberal emphasizes recognition and path to supports; conservatives emphasize limited scope and process.
Relative to its intended legislative type, this bill is a concise administrative directive requiring the OMB Director to reclassify public safety telecommunicators within the SOC and succeeds in clearly stating the problem, the actor, and a deadline.
This bill directs the Director of the Office of Management and Budget to reclassify public safety telecommunicators as a "protective service occupation" in the Standard Occupational Classification (SOC) system, and requires that change to occur within 30 days of enactment.
The text frames the change as correcting an inaccurate representation and aligning SOC classifications with the nature of 9-1-1 telecommunicators’ duties.
Very narrow administrative directive with low fiscal and ideological stakes, historically easier to enact, though procedural Senate barriers and absent cost estimates create uncertainty.
Relative to its intended legislative type, this bill is a concise administrative directive requiring the OMB Director to reclassify public safety telecommunicators within the SOC and succeeds in clearly stating the problem, the actor, and a deadline. It is limited in procedural and definitional detail.
Liberal emphasizes recognition and path to supports; conservatives emphasize limited scope and process.
These are examples from the analysis, not a ranked list of the most-affected groups.
Liberal emphasizes recognition and path to supports; conservatives emphasize limited scope and process.
Overall supportive; views the bill as formal recognition of 9-1-1 telecommunicators' lifesaving roles and trauma exposure.
Sees the SOC change as a practical step toward better data, respectful classification, and potential policy improvements for worker supports.
Generally favorable but cautious.
Views the bill as a narrowly scoped administrative correction that improves statistical accuracy, while noting potential procedural concerns about congressional direction of SOC updates and the short implementation timeline.
Mildly supportive or neutral.
Sees the bill as a low-cost, symbolic recognition of public safety telecommunicators' work, but is wary of Congress ordering administrative classification changes and short deadlines for executive agencies.
Reached or meaningfully advanced
Reached or meaningfully advanced
Still ahead
Still ahead
Still ahead
Very narrow administrative directive with low fiscal and ideological stakes, historically easier to enact, though procedural Senate barriers and absent cost estimates create uncertainty.
The bill has not accumulated any surfaced votes yet.
Liberal emphasizes recognition and path to supports; conservatives emphasize limited scope and process.
Very narrow administrative directive with low fiscal and ideological stakes, historically easier to enact, though procedural Senate barrier…
Relative to its intended legislative type, this bill is a concise administrative directive requiring the OMB Director to reclassify public safety telecommunicators within the SOC and succeeds in clearly stating the prob…
Go beyond the headline summary with full stakeholder mapping, legislative design analysis, passage barriers, and lens-by-lens tradeoff breakdowns.