Referred to the Committee on Financial Services, and in addition to the Committee on Ways and Means, for a period to be subsequently determined by the Speaker, in each case for co…
This bill creates a competitive HUD grant program to support co-locating affordable housing and eligible child care providers through design, planning, construction, conversion, preservation, retrofit, long-term leasing, or renovation. Grants (up to $10 million per award) prioritize projects in child care deserts, low-income, rural areas, Head Start partnerships, and CDFI partnerships, with HUD technical assistance and annual reporting.
Left emphasizes equity, access, Head Start partnerships, and anti-eviction protections
Relative to its intended legislative type, this bill establishes a substantive federal grant program with clear purpose, statutory authorization, definitional integration with existing law, and a reporting framework, while delegating operational particulars to the administering agency.
This bill creates a competitive HUD grant program to support co-locating affordable housing and eligible child care providers through design, planning, construction, conversion, preservation, retrofit, long-term leasing, or renovation.
Grants (up to $10 million per award) prioritize projects in child care deserts, low-income, rural areas, Head Start partnerships, and CDFI partnerships, with HUD technical assistance and annual reporting.
It authorizes $100 million per year for FY2025–2030 and directs a GAO study on child care availability and affordability for public housing residents.
Modest chance: program is limited and pragmatic, but requires appropriations and must clear Senate procedural and fiscal hurdles.
Relative to its intended legislative type, this bill establishes a substantive federal grant program with clear purpose, statutory authorization, definitional integration with existing law, and a reporting framework, while delegating operational particulars to the administering agency.
Left emphasizes equity, access, Head Start partnerships, and anti-eviction protections
These are examples from the analysis, not a ranked list of the most-affected groups.
Left emphasizes equity, access, Head Start partnerships, and anti-eviction protections
Generally supportive; views co-locating housing and child care as a practical way to lower costs and increase access for low-income families.
Sees priorities for child care deserts, Head Start, and anti-eviction certification as aligned with equity goals.
May consider funding levels modest and seek stronger operational funding assurances.
Cautiously supportive as a targeted federal pilot to address both housing and child care supply constraints.
Values the competitive, prioritized approach and GAO study, but wants clear metrics, cost controls, and safeguards against displacement.
Would seek measurable outcomes and accountability.
Skeptical due to new federal spending and involvement in local development decisions.
Concerns focus on federal overreach, taxpayer cost, and the precedent of HUD directing local land-use or child care operations.
Might support limited pilots with stronger private matching and local control.
Reached or meaningfully advanced
Reached or meaningfully advanced
Still ahead
Still ahead
Still ahead
Modest chance: program is limited and pragmatic, but requires appropriations and must clear Senate procedural and fiscal hurdles.
The bill has not accumulated any surfaced votes yet.
Left emphasizes equity, access, Head Start partnerships, and anti-eviction protections
Modest chance: program is limited and pragmatic, but requires appropriations and must clear Senate procedural and fiscal hurdles.
Relative to its intended legislative type, this bill establishes a substantive federal grant program with clear purpose, statutory authorization, definitional integration with existing law, and a reporting framework, wh…
Go beyond the headline summary with full stakeholder mapping, legislative design analysis, passage barriers, and lens-by-lens tradeoff breakdowns.