Referred to the House Committee on Energy and Commerce.
The bill directs NTIA (the Assistant Secretary) and the FCC to identify and reallocate at least 2,500 MHz of spectrum between 1.3 GHz and 13.2 GHz for non‑Federal or shared use, including at least 1,250 MHz for full‑power commercial licensed use. It sets multi‑year deadlines for identification and auctions, requires at least 125 MHz be made available unlicensed, mandates reports and annual briefings to Congress, and updates Spectrum Relocation Fund rules and notification timelines to accelerate reallocation and cover relocation costs.
Liberals worry auctions favour big carriers; conservatives emphasize economic growth.
Relative to its intended legislative type, this bill is a substantive statutory directive to NTIA and the FCC to identify, reallocate, and auction specified quantities of spectrum within a defined band, accompanied by concrete numeric targets, deadlines, statutory amendments, and comprehensive reporting requirements.
The bill directs NTIA (the Assistant Secretary) and the FCC to identify and reallocate at least 2,500 MHz of spectrum between 1.3 GHz and 13.2 GHz for non‑Federal or shared use, including at least 1,250 MHz for full‑power commercial licensed use.
It sets multi‑year deadlines for identification and auctions, requires at least 125 MHz be made available unlicensed, mandates reports and annual briefings to Congress, and updates Spectrum Relocation Fund rules and notification timelines to accelerate reallocation and cover relocation costs.
Technically targeted and potentially bipartisan but significant stakeholder and national‑security complications plus fiscal uncertainty create a moderate pathway to enactment.
Relative to its intended legislative type, this bill is a substantive statutory directive to NTIA and the FCC to identify, reallocate, and auction specified quantities of spectrum within a defined band, accompanied by concrete numeric targets, deadlines, statutory amendments, and comprehensive reporting requirements.
Liberals worry auctions favour big carriers; conservatives emphasize economic growth.
These are examples from the analysis, not a ranked list of the most-affected groups.
Liberals worry auctions favour big carriers; conservatives emphasize economic growth.
Generally cautious support for increasing broadband capacity and some unlicensed spectrum, paired with concern about privatization benefits accruing to major carriers.
Worries focus on national security, public‑safety impacts, and equitable access for communities; seeks stronger public interest guardrails and funding transparency.
Sees this as a pragmatic, pro‑growth measure to unlock valuable mid‑band spectrum while providing oversight.
Supportive if timelines and funding are realistic and if federal mission impacts are managed transparently and adequately funded.
Favorably disposed because it prioritizes freeing spectrum for commercial use, auctions, and private‑sector deployment.
Concerned mainly about any unnecessary restrictions or small unlicensed carve‑outs, but broadly supports accelerating spectrum availability.
Reached or meaningfully advanced
Reached or meaningfully advanced
Still ahead
Still ahead
Still ahead
Technically targeted and potentially bipartisan but significant stakeholder and national‑security complications plus fiscal uncertainty create a moderate pathway to enactment.
The bill has not accumulated any surfaced votes yet.
Liberals worry auctions favour big carriers; conservatives emphasize economic growth.
Technically targeted and potentially bipartisan but significant stakeholder and national‑security complications plus fiscal uncertainty cre…
Relative to its intended legislative type, this bill is a substantive statutory directive to NTIA and the FCC to identify, reallocate, and auction specified quantities of spectrum within a defined band, accompanied by c…
Go beyond the headline summary with full stakeholder mapping, legislative design analysis, passage barriers, and lens-by-lens tradeoff breakdowns.