Subcommittee Hearings Held
This bill amends the Long-Term Leasing Act to add the Mashpee Wampanoag Tribe Reservation and the Wampanoag Tribe of Gay Head (Aquinnah) Reservation to the list of tribal lands eligible for leases up to 99 years. The change authorizes those two tribes to enter into long-term leases for land held in trust.
Progressives emphasize tribal sovereignty and development benefits
Relative to its intended legislative type, this bill is a narrowly focused substantive statutory amendment that clearly identifies the target statute and the change (authorizing up to 99-year leases for two named tribal trust lands).
This bill amends the Long-Term Leasing Act to add the Mashpee Wampanoag Tribe Reservation and the Wampanoag Tribe of Gay Head (Aquinnah) Reservation to the list of tribal lands eligible for leases up to 99 years.
The change authorizes those two tribes to enter into long-term leases for land held in trust.
The statutory amendment is narrowly focused on adding the two named reservations to existing long-term leasing authority.
Limited, technical change with low fiscal impact and plausible bipartisan support; local opposition or procedural hurdles are main risks.
Relative to its intended legislative type, this bill is a narrowly focused substantive statutory amendment that clearly identifies the target statute and the change (authorizing up to 99-year leases for two named tribal trust lands).
Progressives emphasize tribal sovereignty and development benefits
These are examples from the analysis, not a ranked list of the most-affected groups.
Progressives emphasize tribal sovereignty and development benefits
Likely supportive as a targeted measure that advances tribal self-determination and economic development.
Seen as correcting an omission and enabling longer-term investment on tribal trust lands.
Mostly supportive as a narrow, incremental statutory fix enabling predictable long-term leases.
Sees this as low-cost and routine but wants clear safeguards and accountability.
Mixed view: some will accept it as a narrow, administrative change; others worry about expanding special statutory privileges for tribes.
Emphasis on preserving property rights and preventing unintended consequences.
Reached or meaningfully advanced
Reached or meaningfully advanced
Still ahead
Still ahead
Still ahead
Limited, technical change with low fiscal impact and plausible bipartisan support; local opposition or procedural hurdles are main risks.
The bill has not accumulated any surfaced votes yet.
Progressives emphasize tribal sovereignty and development benefits
Limited, technical change with low fiscal impact and plausible bipartisan support; local opposition or procedural hurdles are main risks.
Relative to its intended legislative type, this bill is a narrowly focused substantive statutory amendment that clearly identifies the target statute and the change (authorizing up to 99-year leases for two named tribal…
Go beyond the headline summary with full stakeholder mapping, legislative design analysis, passage barriers, and lens-by-lens tradeoff breakdowns.