Referred to the House Committee on Oversight and Government Reform.
The bill amends the District of Columbia Official Code to add an exception so that nonprofit organizations described in section 501(c) of the Internal Revenue Code do not 'do business' in D.C. when they hold meetings with Members of Congress or federal officials at locations owned or leased by the federal government. That treatment would mean such meetings would not trigger D.C. registration requirements tied to "doing business" in the District.
Liberals emphasize transparency and foreign-influence risks
Relative to its intended legislative type, this bill is a narrowly focused substantive amendment that clearly identifies a specific legal exemption and implements it by amending a discrete provision of the D.C. Code.
The bill amends the District of Columbia Official Code to add an exception so that nonprofit organizations described in section 501(c) of the Internal Revenue Code do not 'do business' in D.C. when they hold meetings with Members of Congress or federal officials at locations owned or leased by the federal government.
That treatment would mean such meetings would not trigger D.C. registration requirements tied to "doing business" in the District.
The change applies to meetings held in federal-owned or -leased locations in the District of Columbia.
Low-cost, narrow change improves odds, but controversy over avoiding local registration and lack of compromise features lowers overall probability.
Relative to its intended legislative type, this bill is a narrowly focused substantive amendment that clearly identifies a specific legal exemption and implements it by amending a discrete provision of the D.C. Code.
Liberals emphasize transparency and foreign-influence risks
These are examples from the analysis, not a ranked list of the most-affected groups.
Liberals emphasize transparency and foreign-influence risks
Cautiously critical.
Supports protecting the right to petition government but worries the exception reduces local transparency and accountability.
Concerned the broad 501(c) reference could shield political or foreign-influenced advocacy from D.C. registration rules.
Generally sympathetic to reducing needless regulatory burdens but wants clarity and safeguards.
Sees value in protecting petitioning while preserving transparency.
Would support with narrowly tailored amendments to prevent misuse.
Supportive.
Views the bill as a pro–First Amendment, pro-civic-engagement reform that removes a burdensome local registration hurdle for nonprofits.
Regards it as a limited, sensible protection for petitioning government in federal spaces.
Reached or meaningfully advanced
Reached or meaningfully advanced
Still ahead
Still ahead
Still ahead
Low-cost, narrow change improves odds, but controversy over avoiding local registration and lack of compromise features lowers overall probability.
The bill has not accumulated any surfaced votes yet.
Liberals emphasize transparency and foreign-influence risks
Low-cost, narrow change improves odds, but controversy over avoiding local registration and lack of compromise features lowers overall prob…
Relative to its intended legislative type, this bill is a narrowly focused substantive amendment that clearly identifies a specific legal exemption and implements it by amending a discrete provision of the D.C. Code.
Go beyond the headline summary with full stakeholder mapping, legislative design analysis, passage barriers, and lens-by-lens tradeoff breakdowns.