Referred to the Subcommittee on Livestock, Dairy, and Poultry.
The bill bars any Federal funds from being used to finalize, implement, administer, or enforce the Food Safety and Inspection Service's proposed "Salmonella Framework for Raw Poultry Products" published August 7, 2024 (89 Fed. Reg. 64678).
Public health protection versus regulatory burden on producers
Relative to its intended legislative type, this bill presents a concise and legally specific operational prohibition, clearly identifying the regulatory action to be blocked.
The bill bars any Federal funds from being used to finalize, implement, administer, or enforce the Food Safety and Inspection Service's proposed "Salmonella Framework for Raw Poultry Products" published August 7, 2024 (89 Fed.
Reg. 64678).
It specifically prohibits funding related to that proposed rule and determination.
Very narrow but politically charged; easier to advance as an appropriations rider than as standalone statute, though opponents include public-health stakeholders.
Relative to its intended legislative type, this bill presents a concise and legally specific operational prohibition, clearly identifying the regulatory action to be blocked. It succeeds at naming the target and prescribing the prohibited uses of funds but provides minimal guidance on implementation, fiscal treatment, enforcement, or handling of edge cases.
Public health protection versus regulatory burden on producers
These are examples from the analysis, not a ranked list of the most-affected groups.
Public health protection versus regulatory burden on producers
Likely opposes the bill as undermining a public-health regulatory effort aimed at reducing Salmonella in poultry.
Views the prohibition as favoring industry compliance costs over consumer safety and agency science.
Views the bill with caution; finds merit in pausing a major rule until costs and implementation impacts are clear.
Wants a balanced outcome that protects public health while avoiding undue burdens on producers.
Likely supports the bill as a check on regulatory overreach that could impose costs on poultry producers.
Sees fund prohibition as protecting producers, rural economies, and limiting federal intrusion.
Reached or meaningfully advanced
Reached or meaningfully advanced
Still ahead
Still ahead
Still ahead
Very narrow but politically charged; easier to advance as an appropriations rider than as standalone statute, though opponents include public-health stakeholders.
The bill has not accumulated any surfaced votes yet.
Public health protection versus regulatory burden on producers
Very narrow but politically charged; easier to advance as an appropriations rider than as standalone statute, though opponents include publ…
Relative to its intended legislative type, this bill presents a concise and legally specific operational prohibition, clearly identifying the regulatory action to be blocked. It succeeds at naming the target and prescri…
Go beyond the headline summary with full stakeholder mapping, legislative design analysis, passage barriers, and lens-by-lens tradeoff breakdowns.