H.R. 7106 (119th)Bill Overview

Enhancing Skilled Nursing Facilities Act

Health|Health
Cosponsors
Support
Bipartisan
Introduced
Jan 15, 2026
Discussions
Bill Text
Current stageCommittee

Referred to the Committee on Energy and Commerce, and in addition to the Committee on Ways and Means, for a period to be subsequently determined by the Speaker, in each case for c…

Introduced
Committee
Floor
President
Law
Congressional Activities
01 · The brief
Plain-English summaryWhat this bill actually does

The bill amends Medicare (Titles XVIII) and Medicaid (Title XIX) statutes to allow nurse practitioners, physician assistants, and certain clinical nurse specialists to perform or supervise specified functions in skilled nursing facilities and nursing facilities that were previously limited to physicians. Changes include who can certify post-hospital extended care, supervise resident care, be listed as attending physician, recertify need for services, and satisfy residents’ rights language, while deferring to State law and offering a State option for clinical nurse specialist supervision.

Why people may split

Liberal emphasizes access and workforce benefits

Watch point

Relative to its intended legislative type, this bill is a clear, textually specific statutory amendment package that directly modifies multiple Medicare and Medicaid provisions to expand allowable provider roles.

The bill amends Medicare (Titles XVIII) and Medicaid (Title XIX) statutes to allow nurse practitioners, physician assistants, and certain clinical nurse specialists to perform or supervise specified functions in skilled nursing facilities and nursing facilities that were previously limited to physicians.

Changes include who can certify post-hospital extended care, supervise resident care, be listed as attending physician, recertify need for services, and satisfy residents’ rights language, while deferring to State law and offering a State option for clinical nurse specialist supervision.

Passage40/100

Narrow, administratively focused bills often clear Congress if noncontroversial; professional scope disputes and legislative calendar are main barriers.

CredibilityPartially aligned

Relative to its intended legislative type, this bill is a clear, textually specific statutory amendment package that directly modifies multiple Medicare and Medicaid provisions to expand allowable provider roles. The mechanical drafting of the specific insertions/deletions is the bill's strongest element.

Contention55/100

Liberal emphasizes access and workforce benefits

02 · What it does

Who stands to gain, and who may push back.

Likely benefits vs burdens50% / 50%
CitiesStates

These are examples from the analysis, not a ranked list of the most-affected groups.

Likely helped
  • CitiesExpands provider types authorized to certify and supervise SNF care, increasing clinical capacity.
  • Potential benefitMay reduce delays in admissions and recertifications by allowing non-physician clinicians to perform required certifica…
  • Potential benefitCould lower Medicare and Medicaid costs per episode by shifting some physician tasks to mid-level clinicians.
Likely burdened
  • Potential burdenReduces required physician oversight for SNF residents in some circumstances, possibly affecting clinical oversight.
  • StatesCreates variation across states because authority depends on state law and optional state choices.
  • Potential burdenMay raise concerns about consistent quality or patient safety if supervision standards vary.
03 · Why people split

Why the argument around this bill splits.

Liberal emphasizes access and workforce benefits
Progressive90%

Likely broadly supportive.

The bill expands recognized roles for advanced practice clinicians, improving access to timely care in nursing facilities and addressing workforce shortages.

Supporters will still want safeguards against cost-cutting that reduces care quality.

Leans supportive
Centrist70%

Cautiously favorable if implemented with clear safeguards.

The bill pragmatically addresses physician shortages in long-term care settings but needs defined supervision standards, outcome monitoring, and state-by-state clarity.

Leans supportive
Conservative40%

Mixed to somewhat skeptical.

Some conservatives will like reduced regulatory constraints and greater workforce flexibility, but many will worry federal changes could lower care standards and displace physician roles in Medicare/Medicaid settings.

Split reaction
04 · Can it pass?

The path through Congress.

Introduced

Reached or meaningfully advanced

Committee

Reached or meaningfully advanced

Floor

Still ahead

President

Still ahead

Law

Still ahead

Passage likelihood40/100

Narrow, administratively focused bills often clear Congress if noncontroversial; professional scope disputes and legislative calendar are main barriers.

Scope and complexity
24%
Scopenarrow
52%
Complexitymedium
Why this could stall
  • Stakeholder positions from physician organizations and nursing groups
  • Absence of a public cost estimate (CBO score) in text
05 · Recent votes

Recent votes on the bill.

No vote history yet

The bill has not accumulated any surfaced votes yet.

06 · Go deeper

Go deeper than the headline read.

Included on this page

Liberal emphasizes access and workforce benefits

Narrow, administratively focused bills often clear Congress if noncontroversial; professional scope disputes and legislative calendar are m…

Unlocked analysis

Relative to its intended legislative type, this bill is a clear, textually specific statutory amendment package that directly modifies multiple Medicare and Medicaid provisions to expand allowable provider roles. The me…

Go beyond the headline summary with full stakeholder mapping, legislative design analysis, passage barriers, and lens-by-lens tradeoff breakdowns.

Perspective breakdownsPassage barriersLegislative design reviewStakeholder impact map
Open full analysis