Referred to the House Committee on Education and Workforce.
Amends the Child Abuse Prevention and Treatment Act to require the HHS national clearinghouse on child abuse and neglect to include data on animal abuse. "Animal abuse" includes acts or failures to act causing undue pain, suffering, or death to an animal, irrespective of whether the conduct violates state or local cruelty laws. The change directs collection and inclusion of incidence data in the clearinghouse.
Whether federal data collection is appropriate versus state control
Relative to its intended administrative/operational type, this bill is narrowly focused and explicit about the statutory amendment and responsible official but provides limited implementation detail and omits fiscal, privacy, data standardization, and accountability provisions that would ordinarily accompany an operational change to a national information system.
Amends the Child Abuse Prevention and Treatment Act to require the HHS national clearinghouse on child abuse and neglect to include data on animal abuse. "Animal abuse" includes acts or failures to act causing undue pain, suffering, or death to an animal, irrespective of whether the conduct violates state or local cruelty laws.
The change directs collection and inclusion of incidence data in the clearinghouse.
Technically simple and low-cost amendment with bipartisan appeal, but many standalone bills stall absent prioritization or inclusion in larger package.
Relative to its intended administrative/operational type, this bill is narrowly focused and explicit about the statutory amendment and responsible official but provides limited implementation detail and omits fiscal, privacy, data standardization, and accountability provisions that would ordinarily accompany an operational change to a national information system.
Whether federal data collection is appropriate versus state control
These are examples from the analysis, not a ranked list of the most-affected groups.
Whether federal data collection is appropriate versus state control
Likely supportive; views added animal-abuse data as valuable for identifying co-occurring household harm.
Would want strong privacy, funding, and cross-reporting protections.
Cautiously supportive as a targeted, evidence-building step to protect children.
Wants clear definitions, cost estimates, and legal guardrails to avoid unintended burdens.
Skeptical; supports child safety but worries about federal overreach, vague standards, and collecting noncriminal conduct data.
Prefers state control and clearer limits.
Reached or meaningfully advanced
Reached or meaningfully advanced
Still ahead
Still ahead
Still ahead
Technically simple and low-cost amendment with bipartisan appeal, but many standalone bills stall absent prioritization or inclusion in larger package.
The bill has not accumulated any surfaced votes yet.
Whether federal data collection is appropriate versus state control
Technically simple and low-cost amendment with bipartisan appeal, but many standalone bills stall absent prioritization or inclusion in lar…
Relative to its intended administrative/operational type, this bill is narrowly focused and explicit about the statutory amendment and responsible official but provides limited implementation detail and omits fiscal, pr…
Go beyond the headline summary with full stakeholder mapping, legislative design analysis, passage barriers, and lens-by-lens tradeoff breakdowns.