Referred to the House Committee on Veterans' Affairs.
The bill amends 38 U.S.C. 3736 to require the Secretary of Veterans Affairs to submit a quarterly report to the House and Senate Veterans’ Affairs Committees. Each quarterly report must cover the prior quarter and include: counts of loans insured/guaranteed/made; application denials; loans refinanced under specified sections; mortgages 60- and 90-days delinquent; and full-time employees in the VA Home Loan Guaranty Service (or successor).
Liberals stress transparency and veteran-protection uses of data
Relative to its intended legislative type, this bill clearly creates a statutory quarterly reporting requirement with concrete data elements and integrates cleanly into existing title 38 authorities, but it lacks several practical implementation details.
The bill amends 38 U.S.C. 3736 to require the Secretary of Veterans Affairs to submit a quarterly report to the House and Senate Veterans’ Affairs Committees.
Each quarterly report must cover the prior quarter and include: counts of loans insured/guaranteed/made; application denials; loans refinanced under specified sections; mortgages 60- and 90-days delinquent; and full-time employees in the VA Home Loan Guaranty Service (or successor).
Low-policy, technical reporting bills often pass, but standalone status and procedure may limit odds unless folded into larger VA or oversight package.
Relative to its intended legislative type, this bill clearly creates a statutory quarterly reporting requirement with concrete data elements and integrates cleanly into existing title 38 authorities, but it lacks several practical implementation details.
Liberals stress transparency and veteran-protection uses of data
These are examples from the analysis, not a ranked list of the most-affected groups.
Liberals stress transparency and veteran-protection uses of data
Likely supportive because the bill increases transparency and oversight of VA home loan administration.
Quarterly data could help identify borrower distress and staffing shortfalls affecting veterans’ access to benefits.
Generally favorable toward increased, regular reporting as a reasonable oversight tool.
Will weigh benefits of transparency against added administrative burden and potential duplication of existing reports.
Cautiously supportive of accountability for a popular veterans program but concerned about added bureaucracy and potential congressional micromanagement.
Acceptable if reporting is low-cost and non-intrusive.
Reached or meaningfully advanced
Reached or meaningfully advanced
Still ahead
Still ahead
Still ahead
Low-policy, technical reporting bills often pass, but standalone status and procedure may limit odds unless folded into larger VA or oversight package.
The bill has not accumulated any surfaced votes yet.
Liberals stress transparency and veteran-protection uses of data
Low-policy, technical reporting bills often pass, but standalone status and procedure may limit odds unless folded into larger VA or oversi…
Relative to its intended legislative type, this bill clearly creates a statutory quarterly reporting requirement with concrete data elements and integrates cleanly into existing title 38 authorities, but it lacks severa…
Go beyond the headline summary with full stakeholder mapping, legislative design analysis, passage barriers, and lens-by-lens tradeoff breakdowns.