H.R. 726 (119th)Bill Overview

Crow Tribe Water Rights Settlement Amendments Act of 2025

Native Americans|Dams and canalsGovernment trust funds
Cosponsors
Support
Republican
Introduced
Jan 24, 2025
Discussions
Bill Text
Current stageCommittee

Referred to the House Committee on Natural Resources.

Introduced
Committee
Floor
President
Law
Congressional Activities
01 · The brief
Plain-English summaryWhat this bill actually does

<p><strong>Crow Tribe Water Rights Settlement Amendments Act of 2025</strong></p><p>This bill revises the water rights settlement agreement entered into by the Crow Tribe of Montana and Montana.</p><p>The Crow Tribe Water Rights Settlement Act of 2010 ratified, authorized, and confirmed the water rights compact between the tribe and Montana. Among other provisions, this settlement act authorized the Bureau of Reclamation to plan, design and construct the following two major projects on the Crow Reservation: (1) the rehabilitation and improvement of the Crow Irrigation Project (CIP); and (2) the planning, design, and construction of the MR&amp;I System (the municipal, rural, and industrial water system of the Crow Reservation).</p><p>Among other provisions, the bill revises the settlement act to</p><ul><li>replace references to the <em>MR&amp;I System</em> with <em>MR&amp;I Projects</em>;&nbsp;</li><li>establish a nontrust, interest-bearing account&nbsp;(to be known as the Crow&nbsp;CIP Implementation Account) to allow Reclamation to continue to work on the rehabilitation of the CIP;&nbsp;</li><li>create a new MR&amp;I Projects Account, through which the tribe must use funds for activities related to water production, treatment, or delivery infrastructure; and</li><li>extend by five years (to 2030) the period during which the tribe has the exclusive right to construct hydropower facilities on the Yellowtail&nbsp;Afterbay Dam in Montana.</li></ul>

Why people may split

The main political fault lines are not fully surfaced yet, so coalition durability is still unclear.

Watch point

The next hurdle is converting committee movement into a floor coalition.

<p><strong>Crow Tribe Water Rights Settlement Amendments Act of 2025</strong></p><p>This bill revises the water rights settlement agreement entered into by the Crow Tribe of Montana and Montana.</p><p>The Crow Tribe Water Rights Settlement Act of 2010 ratified, authorized, and confirmed the water rights compact between the tribe and Montana.

Among other provisions, this settlement act authorized the Bureau of Reclamation to plan, design and construct the following two major projects on the Crow Reservation: (1) the rehabilitation and improvement of the Crow Irrigation Project (CIP); and (2) the planning, design, and construction of the MR&amp;I System (the municipal, rural, and industrial water system of the Crow Reservation).</p><p>Among other provisions, the bill revises the settlement act to</p><ul><li>replace references to the <em>MR&amp;I System</em> with <em>MR&amp;I Projects</em>;&nbsp;</li><li>establish a nontrust, interest-bearing account&nbsp;(to be known as the Crow&nbsp;CIP Implementation Account) to allow Reclamation to continue to work on the rehabilitation of the CIP;&nbsp;</li><li>create a new MR&amp;I Projects Account, through which the tribe must use funds for activities related to water production, treatment, or delivery infrastructure; and</li><li>extend by five years (to 2030) the period during which the tribe has the exclusive right to construct hydropower facilities on the Yellowtail&nbsp;Afterbay Dam in Montana.</li></ul>

Passage38/100

This bill has moved beyond introduction, but committee and floor dynamics still determine whether it can build durable support.

CredibilityPartial

How solid the drafting looks.

Contention62/100

The main political fault lines are not fully surfaced yet, so coalition durability is still unclear.

02 · What it does

Who stands to gain, and who may push back.

Likely benefits vs burdens0% / 100%
Likely helpedLikely burdened

These are examples from the analysis, not a ranked list of the most-affected groups.

Likely helped
  • No clear beneficiaries surfaced yet.
Likely burdened
  • No clear downsides surfaced yet.
03 · Why people split

Why the argument around this bill splits.

The main political fault lines are not fully surfaced yet, so coalition durability is still unclear.
Progressive

The main political fault lines are not fully surfaced yet, so coalition durability is still unclear.

Unclear
Centrist

The main political fault lines are not fully surfaced yet, so coalition durability is still unclear.

Unclear
Conservative

The main political fault lines are not fully surfaced yet, so coalition durability is still unclear.

Unclear
04 · Can it pass?

The path through Congress.

Introduced

Reached or meaningfully advanced

Committee

Reached or meaningfully advanced

Floor

Still ahead

President

Still ahead

Law

Still ahead

Passage likelihood38/100

This bill has moved beyond introduction, but committee and floor dynamics still determine whether it can build durable support.

Why this could stall
  • The next hurdle is converting committee movement into a floor coalition.
05 · Recent votes

Recent votes on the bill.

No vote history yet

The bill has not accumulated any surfaced votes yet.

06 · Go deeper

Go deeper than the headline read.

Included on this page

The main political fault lines are not fully surfaced yet, so coalition durability is still unclear.

This bill has moved beyond introduction, but committee and floor dynamics still determine whether it can build durable support.

Unlocked analysis

Pro readers get the full perspective split, passage barriers, legislative design review, stakeholder impact map, and lens-based policy tradeoff analysis for Crow Tribe Water Rights Settlement Amendments Act of 2025.

Go beyond the headline summary with full stakeholder mapping, legislative design analysis, passage barriers, and lens-by-lens tradeoff breakdowns.

Perspective breakdownsPassage barriersLegislative design reviewStakeholder impact map
Open full analysis