Received in the Senate and Read twice and referred to the Committee on Health, Education, Labor, and Pensions.
Creates an NSF-authorized program to fund competitive R&D awards to modernize K–12 mathematical and statistical modeling education. Encourages partnerships among higher education, nonprofits, local education agencies, industry, and Federal labs, and prioritizes teacher preparation, inclusive access, real-data problem-based learning, and evaluation.
Federal involvement versus local control over K–12 curriculum.
Relative to its intended legislative type, this bill establishes a clear statutory grant authority within the NSF to support research and development for mathematical and statistical modeling education in K–12, paired with a mandated external study (NASEM).
Creates an NSF-authorized program to fund competitive R&D awards to modernize K–12 mathematical and statistical modeling education.
Encourages partnerships among higher education, nonprofits, local education agencies, industry, and Federal labs, and prioritizes teacher preparation, inclusive access, real-data problem-based learning, and evaluation.
Requires an external study (NASEM or similar) on barriers, pathways, and teacher preparation, and authorizes $10 million annually (2026–2030) plus $1 million annually for the study, with a sunset and use of NSF-appropriated funds.
Low controversy, modest authorization, and built-in evaluation increase viability, but final outcome depends on appropriations and Senate scheduling.
Relative to its intended legislative type, this bill establishes a clear statutory grant authority within the NSF to support research and development for mathematical and statistical modeling education in K–12, paired with a mandated external study (NASEM). It defines purposes, authorized activities, target populations, evaluates requirements, and provides explicit authorization levels and a sunset date. Many implementation responsibilities and finer procedural choices are appropriately delegated to the NSF Director, but the statute leaves several operational specifics and safeguards to agency implementation.
Federal involvement versus local control over K–12 curriculum.
These are examples from the analysis, not a ranked list of the most-affected groups.
Federal involvement versus local control over K–12 curriculum.
Generally favorable: sees the bill as a targeted federal investment to modernize math education, broaden STEM access, and build a diverse pipeline.
Values emphasis on underrepresented students, teacher development, real-world data, and evaluation.
May push for larger funding and stronger accountability for equity outcomes.
Cautiously supportive: appreciates workforce alignment, evaluation requirements, and modest funding.
Wants assurance against duplication with existing NSF or Education programs and clear metrics for success.
Will favor evidence of cost-effectiveness and scalable models before strong expansion.
Skeptical: cautious about additional federal involvement in K–12 curriculum and local control.
Concerns focus on federal funding origins, possible curricular influence, and long-term cost.
May support workforce-development aims but prefer state/local or private-sector-led solutions.
Reached or meaningfully advanced
Reached or meaningfully advanced
Still ahead
Still ahead
Still ahead
Low controversy, modest authorization, and built-in evaluation increase viability, but final outcome depends on appropriations and Senate scheduling.
The bill has not accumulated any surfaced votes yet.
Federal involvement versus local control over K–12 curriculum.
Low controversy, modest authorization, and built-in evaluation increase viability, but final outcome depends on appropriations and Senate s…
Relative to its intended legislative type, this bill establishes a clear statutory grant authority within the NSF to support research and development for mathematical and statistical modeling education in K–12, paired w…
Go beyond the headline summary with full stakeholder mapping, legislative design analysis, passage barriers, and lens-by-lens tradeoff breakdowns.