Referred to the House Committee on House Administration.
The bill (OMAR Act) amends the Federal Election Campaign Act to: (1) prohibit authorized committees or candidate-controlled political committees (excluding party committees) from directly or indirectly compensating a candidate’s spouse for services; (2) require those committees to separately disclose any payments to the candidate’s spouse and immediate family members; (3) make a candidate personally liable for penalties when they knew of a violation and bar committees from reimbursing candidates for such penalties.
The amendments apply to payments made on or after enactment.
Low fiscal impact and clear text help, but member resistance and Senate procedural barriers reduce overall prospects.
Relative to its intended legislative type, this bill establishes clear, specific statutory prohibitions and reporting obligations and integrates them into the Federal Election Campaign Act. It attaches enforcement consequences to candidates and prevents committees from reimbursing penalties, using existing FECA mechanisms for implementation.
Progressives emphasize anti-nepotism and accountability benefits
Progressives emphasize anti-nepotism and accountability benefits
Likely supportive because the bill increases transparency and limits potential nepotism or misuse of campaign funds.
It aligns with anti-corruption and government-ethics priorities, though some progressives might want broader prohibitions.
Generally favorable to the transparency and anti-corruption goals, but cautious about practical effects on small campaigns and legitimate spouse employment.
Would want clearer standards and limited exceptions.
Likely skeptical or opposed due to concerns about federal overreach into private family employment and restrictions on campaign staffing choices.
Views the ban as heavy-handed regulation of political activity.
Reached or meaningfully advanced
Reached or meaningfully advanced
Still ahead
Still ahead
Still ahead
Low fiscal impact and clear text help, but member resistance and Senate procedural barriers reduce overall prospects.
The bill has not accumulated any surfaced votes yet.
Progressives emphasize anti-nepotism and accountability benefits
Low fiscal impact and clear text help, but member resistance and Senate procedural barriers reduce overall prospects.
Relative to its intended legislative type, this bill establishes clear, specific statutory prohibitions and reporting obligations and integrates them into the Federal Election Campaign Act. It attaches enforcement conse…
Go beyond the headline summary with full stakeholder mapping, legislative design analysis, passage barriers, and lens-by-lens tradeoff breakdowns.