H.R. 743 (119th)Bill Overview

Tim’s Act

Government Operations and Politics|CancerCardiovascular and respiratory health
Cosponsors
Support
Democratic
Introduced
Jan 28, 2025
Discussions
Bill Text
Current stageCommittee

Referred to the Subcommittee on Forestry and Horticulture.

Introduced
Committee
Floor
President
Law
Congressional Activities
01 · The brief
Plain-English summaryWhat this bill actually does

This bill establishes a new special pay and benefits framework for Federal wildland firefighters, including a special base-rate pay scale that replaces GS base pay with grade-specific percentage increases. It creates an incident response premium pay, sets limits and waiver authorities, adds rest and recuperation and mental-health benefits, requires a cancer and cardiovascular disease database, reforms retirement and disability crediting, mandates parity reviews for structural firefighters, and authorizes recruitment bonuses, housing allowances, tuition assistance, and a casualty assistance program.

Why people may split

Progressives emphasize pay, health, and retirement corrections.

Watch point

Relative to its intended legislative type, this bill is a well-specified substantive policy change that provides detailed statutory amendments to pay, premium pay, leave, health tracking, and retirement for Federal wildland firefighters, with clearly defined duties and timelines for agencies and OPM.

This bill establishes a new special pay and benefits framework for Federal wildland firefighters, including a special base-rate pay scale that replaces GS base pay with grade-specific percentage increases.

It creates an incident response premium pay, sets limits and waiver authorities, adds rest and recuperation and mental-health benefits, requires a cancer and cardiovascular disease database, reforms retirement and disability crediting, mandates parity reviews for structural firefighters, and authorizes recruitment bonuses, housing allowances, tuition assistance, and a casualty assistance program.

Passage40/100

Substantive, costly, technically detailed benefits bill with sympathetic constituency but significant fiscal and procedural hurdles absent offsets or package inclusion.

CredibilityPartially aligned

Relative to its intended legislative type, this bill is a well-specified substantive policy change that provides detailed statutory amendments to pay, premium pay, leave, health tracking, and retirement for Federal wildland firefighters, with clearly defined duties and timelines for agencies and OPM. It integrates closely with existing title 5 authorities and anticipates many boundary cases and reporting requirements.

Contention68/100

Progressives emphasize pay, health, and retirement corrections.

02 · What it does

Who stands to gain, and who may push back.

Likely benefits vs burdens50% / 50%
WorkersFederal agencies

These are examples from the analysis, not a ranked list of the most-affected groups.

Likely helped
  • Potential benefitRaises base pay substantially for many wildland firefighter grades, increasing take-home pay for eligible employees.
  • Potential benefitCreates substantial daily premium pay for deployed incident response, increasing compensation during high-demand deploy…
  • WorkersEstablishes mental health programs, seven days paid mental health leave, and expanded workers' compensation recognition.
Likely burdened
  • Federal agenciesIncreases recurring federal wage and benefit costs, raising long-term budgetary obligations.
  • Potential burdenAdds administrative complexity for OPM and agencies to implement new pay scales, reports, and databases.
  • Potential burdenPremium pay exclusions from basic pay and annual caps could complicate retirement accrual and benefit calculations.
03 · Why people split

Why the argument around this bill splits.

Progressives emphasize pay, health, and retirement corrections.
Progressive90%

Overall supportive; views the bill as a long-overdue correction for historically underpaid and under-protected wildland firefighters.

Appreciates health, mental-health, retirement, and recruitment measures while noting administrative discretion could weaken implementation.

Leans supportive
Centrist65%

Generally favorable but pragmatic; supports better pay and health protections to improve recruitment and retention while wanting clearer cost estimates, implementation details, and limits on unpredictable administrative discretion.

Split reaction
Conservative25%

Skeptical; sees the bill as a large permanent expansion of federal pay, retirement, and benefits with material budgetary and precedent risks.

Supports firefighter safety but opposes open-ended compensation increases without offsets or limits.

Likely resistant
04 · Can it pass?

The path through Congress.

Introduced

Reached or meaningfully advanced

Committee

Reached or meaningfully advanced

Floor

Still ahead

President

Still ahead

Law

Still ahead

Passage likelihood40/100

Substantive, costly, technically detailed benefits bill with sympathetic constituency but significant fiscal and procedural hurdles absent offsets or package inclusion.

Scope and complexity
86%
Scopesweeping
86%
Complexityhigh
Why this could stall
  • No public cost estimate (CBO score) provided
  • Whether offsets or budgetary treatment will be offered
05 · Recent votes

Recent votes on the bill.

No vote history yet

The bill has not accumulated any surfaced votes yet.

06 · Go deeper

Go deeper than the headline read.

Included on this page

Progressives emphasize pay, health, and retirement corrections.

Substantive, costly, technically detailed benefits bill with sympathetic constituency but significant fiscal and procedural hurdles absent…

Unlocked analysis

Relative to its intended legislative type, this bill is a well-specified substantive policy change that provides detailed statutory amendments to pay, premium pay, leave, health tracking, and retirement for Federal wild…

Go beyond the headline summary with full stakeholder mapping, legislative design analysis, passage barriers, and lens-by-lens tradeoff breakdowns.

Perspective breakdownsPassage barriersLegislative design reviewStakeholder impact map
Open full analysis