H.R. 759 (119th)Bill Overview

Federal Firefighters Families First Act

Government Operations and Politics|Administrative law and regulatory proceduresEmployee benefits and pensions
Cosponsors
Support
Unknown
Introduced
Jan 28, 2025
Discussions
Bill Text
Current stageCommittee

Referred to the House Committee on Oversight and Government Reform.

Introduced
Committee
Floor
President
Law
Congressional Activities
01 · The brief
Plain-English summaryWhat this bill actually does

The bill amends Title 5 to change how Federal firefighters’ pay is computed for retirement, explicitly counts regularly recurring scheduled overtime toward annuity calculations (adding one-half the hourly rate for those overtime hours), requires OPM to set a maximum regular firefighter workweek not exceeding an average of 60 hours, and takes effect for separations after 60 days following enactment. It aims to improve pay equality, recruitment, and retention of Federal firefighters.

Why people may split

Liberal emphasizes pay fairness and retention benefits

Watch point

Relative to its intended legislative type, this bill is a statutory amendment aimed at changing how Federal firefighter pay and retirement computations are calculated and at directing OPM to define a maximum regular workweek.

The bill amends Title 5 to change how Federal firefighters’ pay is computed for retirement, explicitly counts regularly recurring scheduled overtime toward annuity calculations (adding one-half the hourly rate for those overtime hours), requires OPM to set a maximum regular firefighter workweek not exceeding an average of 60 hours, and takes effect for separations after 60 days following enactment.

It aims to improve pay equality, recruitment, and retention of Federal firefighters.

Passage40/100

Popular subject and technical focus help prospects, but increased retirement costs and need for CBO scoring/offsets moderate likelihood, especially in the Senate.

CredibilityPartially aligned

Relative to its intended legislative type, this bill is a statutory amendment aimed at changing how Federal firefighter pay and retirement computations are calculated and at directing OPM to define a maximum regular workweek. The bill clearly states its purposes and identifies statutory provisions to be amended, adds a formulaic adjustment for annuity computation, and delegates regulatory authority to OPM with a one-year deadline.

Contention68/100

Liberal emphasizes pay fairness and retention benefits

02 · What it does

Who stands to gain, and who may push back.

Likely benefits vs burdens50% / 50%
Federal agencies · Local governmentsFederal agencies

These are examples from the analysis, not a ranked list of the most-affected groups.

Likely helped
  • Federal agenciesHigher annuities for affected federal firefighters due to overtime being partly counted in basic pay.
  • Potential benefitImproved recruitment and retention prospects by increasing expected retirement compensation.
  • Local governmentsGreater pay parity between federal firefighters and some municipal or public-sector counterparts.
Likely burdened
  • Federal agenciesIncreased federal retirement liabilities and long-term pension costs for the government.
  • Federal agenciesHigher near-term agency payroll costs if overtime counts toward basic pay calculations.
  • Federal agenciesPotential upward pressure on agency employer retirement contributions or required appropriations.
03 · Why people split

Why the argument around this bill splits.

Liberal emphasizes pay fairness and retention benefits
Progressive90%

Overall supportive.

The bill raises retirement pay fairness for firefighters by counting recurring scheduled overtime toward annuities and limits extreme workweeks.

It advances pay parity and could help recruitment and retention of front-line public servants.

Leans supportive
Centrist65%

Cautiously favorable if costs are identified and administrable.

The bill targets a narrow group with a clear policy goal, but raises questions about pension liabilities, OPM rulemaking detail, and administrative clarity.

Split reaction
Conservative25%

Skeptical.

While sympathetic to firefighters, the bill increases federal pension obligations and mandates a federal cap on regular workweeks, reducing agency flexibility and raising fiscal concerns without identified offsets.

Likely resistant
04 · Can it pass?

The path through Congress.

Introduced

Reached or meaningfully advanced

Committee

Reached or meaningfully advanced

Floor

Still ahead

President

Still ahead

Law

Still ahead

Passage likelihood40/100

Popular subject and technical focus help prospects, but increased retirement costs and need for CBO scoring/offsets moderate likelihood, especially in the Senate.

Scope and complexity
24%
Scopenarrow
52%
Complexitymedium
Why this could stall
  • Magnitude of fiscal cost (no CBO estimate in text)
  • Number of federal firefighters affected
05 · Recent votes

Recent votes on the bill.

No vote history yet

The bill has not accumulated any surfaced votes yet.

06 · Go deeper

Go deeper than the headline read.

Included on this page

Liberal emphasizes pay fairness and retention benefits

Popular subject and technical focus help prospects, but increased retirement costs and need for CBO scoring/offsets moderate likelihood, es…

Unlocked analysis

Relative to its intended legislative type, this bill is a statutory amendment aimed at changing how Federal firefighter pay and retirement computations are calculated and at directing OPM to define a maximum regular wor…

Go beyond the headline summary with full stakeholder mapping, legislative design analysis, passage barriers, and lens-by-lens tradeoff breakdowns.

Perspective breakdownsPassage barriersLegislative design reviewStakeholder impact map
Open full analysis