H.R. 760 (119th)Bill Overview

Restoring Access to Mountain Homes Act

Emergency Management|Emergency Management
Cosponsors
Support
Republican
Introduced
Jan 28, 2025
Discussions
Bill Text
Current stageCommittee

Referred to the Subcommittee on Economic Development, Public Buildings, and Emergency Management.

Introduced
Committee
Floor
President
Law
Congressional Activities
01 · The brief
Plain-English summaryWhat this bill actually does

The bill authorizes FEMA public assistance reimbursement for repair, replacement, and restoration of private roads and bridges in North Carolina damaged by Tropical Storm Helene (FEMA–4827–DR–NC) when those routes are the sole access to primary residences or essential community services. It sets conditions: inspections, documentation, required permissions, regulatory compliance, and engineer-certified cost estimates; clarifies duplication-of-benefits rules for prior Section 408 assistance; and directs the FEMA Administrator to accept mutually agreed certified cost estimates as presumptively reasonable.

Why people may split

Liberal emphasizes equity and restoring isolated households

Watch point

Relative to its intended legislative type, this bill clearly and narrowly amends Stafford Act eligibility for a particular disaster and jurisdiction and integrates directly with existing statutory authorities.

The bill authorizes FEMA public assistance reimbursement for repair, replacement, and restoration of private roads and bridges in North Carolina damaged by Tropical Storm Helene (FEMA–4827–DR–NC) when those routes are the sole access to primary residences or essential community services.

It sets conditions: inspections, documentation, required permissions, regulatory compliance, and engineer-certified cost estimates; clarifies duplication-of-benefits rules for prior Section 408 assistance; and directs the FEMA Administrator to accept mutually agreed certified cost estimates as presumptively reasonable.

Passage40/100

Narrow, administratively focused relief for a specific disaster increases plausibility, offset by fiscal/precedent objections and need for Senate agreement.

CredibilityPartially aligned

Relative to its intended legislative type, this bill clearly and narrowly amends Stafford Act eligibility for a particular disaster and jurisdiction and integrates directly with existing statutory authorities. It provides specific operational conditions and safeguards (inspections, certifications, duplication rules), but it lacks fiscal detail, timelines, and some definitional precision.

Contention68/100

Liberal emphasizes equity and restoring isolated households

02 · What it does

Who stands to gain, and who may push back.

Likely benefits vs burdens50% / 50%
Homebuyers · Local governmentsFederal agencies

These are examples from the analysis, not a ranked list of the most-affected groups.

Likely helped
  • HomebuyersReduces out-of-pocket repair costs for homeowners reliant on single-access private roads.
  • Potential benefitSpeeds restoration of access for residents and emergency responders in isolated mountain areas.
  • Local governmentsCreates demand for local contractors and engineers, potentially supporting short-term jobs.
Likely burdened
  • Federal agenciesExtends federal funds to repair private infrastructure, raising questions about taxpayer responsibility.
  • Potential burdenCould increase FEMA program costs and administrative burden for a specific disaster declaration.
  • Potential burdenMay create moral hazard by lowering incentives for private maintenance and durable pre-disaster mitigation.
03 · Why people split

Why the argument around this bill splits.

Liberal emphasizes equity and restoring isolated households
Progressive90%

Likely broadly supportive because the bill addresses access and equity for storm-impacted, often rural households.

It restores essential connectivity for isolated residents and clarifies FEMA authority to reimburse private-access repairs after a declared disaster.

Leans supportive
Centrist65%

Generally favorable but cautious: the bill is narrowly targeted to Tropical Storm Helene in North Carolina and contains accountability measures.

However, it raises questions about precedent, fiscal exposure, and long-term program limits.

Split reaction
Conservative25%

Skeptical or opposed: the bill authorizes federal reimbursement for repairs to private property, which many conservatives view as inappropriate expansion of federal spending.

Acceptable only if strictly limited and controlled by states.

Likely resistant
04 · Can it pass?

The path through Congress.

Introduced

Reached or meaningfully advanced

Committee

Reached or meaningfully advanced

Floor

Still ahead

President

Still ahead

Law

Still ahead

Passage likelihood40/100

Narrow, administratively focused relief for a specific disaster increases plausibility, offset by fiscal/precedent objections and need for Senate agreement.

Scope and complexity
24%
Scopenarrow
24%
Complexitylow
Why this could stall
  • No Congressional Budget Office or cost estimate included
  • Potential objections over use of federal funds for private property access
05 · Recent votes

Recent votes on the bill.

No vote history yet

The bill has not accumulated any surfaced votes yet.

06 · Go deeper

Go deeper than the headline read.

Included on this page

Liberal emphasizes equity and restoring isolated households

Narrow, administratively focused relief for a specific disaster increases plausibility, offset by fiscal/precedent objections and need for…

Unlocked analysis

Relative to its intended legislative type, this bill clearly and narrowly amends Stafford Act eligibility for a particular disaster and jurisdiction and integrates directly with existing statutory authorities. It provid…

Go beyond the headline summary with full stakeholder mapping, legislative design analysis, passage barriers, and lens-by-lens tradeoff breakdowns.

Perspective breakdownsPassage barriersLegislative design reviewStakeholder impact map
Open full analysis