- Targeted stakeholdersProvides permanent residency and work authorization for the named individual, ending his removal risk.
- Targeted stakeholdersRescinding orders resolves this case, potentially reducing ongoing immigration enforcement costs for this individual.
- Federal agenciesLegal status likely enables the individual to participate fully in the workforce and pay federal and state taxes.
For the relief of Roberto Carlos Lopez.
Referred to the House Committee on the Judiciary.
This private bill grants Roberto Carlos Lopez eligibility for an immigrant visa or adjustment to lawful permanent resident status, waives grounds of removal or inadmissibility reflected in DHS/State records, and requires rescission of any removal orders.
It conditions filing within two years, reduces the applicable immigrant visa number by one, and bars certain family-preference immigration benefits for his parents, brothers, and sisters.
Low substantive controversy but private, single-person relief historically has low legislative priority and faces procedural hurdles.
Relative to its intended legislative type, this bill is a narrowly tailored substantive policy change (private relief) that is legally specific and integrates cleanly with the Immigration and Nationality Act, providing explicit statutory overrides, deadlines, and agency directives to effect the relief requested for a named individual.
Left/center accept narrow humanitarian relief; right opposes waiver of enforcement
Who stands to gain, and who may push back.
- Targeted stakeholdersCreates a case-specific congressional exemption, which critics may view as circumventing standard immigration procedure…
- Federal agenciesRequires DHS and State Department administrative actions and rescissions, increasing agency workload and processing tas…
- ImmigrantsReduces the nation's immigrant visa supply by one for the individual's birth country, slightly affecting visa availabil…
Why the argument around this bill splits.
Left/center accept narrow humanitarian relief; right opposes waiver of enforcement
Likely supportive if the bill remedies an unjust or humanitarian situation for an individual.
Views congressional relief for a named individual as appropriate in narrow, documented hardship cases but notes family-reunification limits.
Generally supportive if the case is compelling and narrowly tailored.
Sees this as standard congressional relief but emphasizes procedural fairness, limited precedent, and basic vetting.
Likely opposed because the bill waives statutory grounds and rescinds removal orders, seen as undermining immigration enforcement and incentives for compliance.
Views congressional exceptions skeptically.
The path through Congress.
Reached or meaningfully advanced
Reached or meaningfully advanced
Still ahead
Still ahead
Still ahead
Low substantive controversy but private, single-person relief historically has low legislative priority and faces procedural hurdles.
- No legislative cost estimate included
- Underlying facts supporting relief are not in the text
Recent votes on the bill.
No vote history yet
The bill has not accumulated any surfaced votes yet.
Go deeper than the headline read.
Left/center accept narrow humanitarian relief; right opposes waiver of enforcement
Low substantive controversy but private, single-person relief historically has low legislative priority and faces procedural hurdles.
Relative to its intended legislative type, this bill is a narrowly tailored substantive policy change (private relief) that is legally specific and integrates cleanly with the Immigration and Nationality Act, providing…
Go beyond the headline summary with full stakeholder mapping, legislative design analysis, passage barriers, and lens-by-lens tradeoff breakdowns.