H.R. 787 (119th)Bill Overview

Plain Language in Contracting Act

Commerce|CommercePublic contracts and procurement
Cosponsors
Support
Republican
Introduced
Jan 28, 2025
Discussions
Bill Text
Current stageCommittee

Received in the Senate and Read twice and referred to the Committee on Small Business and Entrepreneurship.

Introduced
Committee
Floor
President
Law
Congressional Activities
01 · The brief
Plain-English summaryWhat this bill actually does

Requires federal agencies to write notices aimed at small business concerns on the single Government-wide point of entry in clear, concise, well-organized plain language, and to include searchable key words. The Small Business Administration must issue implementing rules within 90 days; no additional funds are authorized.

Why people may split

Liberals stress equity and access improvements; conservatives stress administrative restraint

Watch point

Relative to its intended legislative type, this bill sets a concise administrative requirement and delegates rulemaking to the SBA with a short deadline, but relies on future rules for substantive detail and omits compliance, accountability, and edge-case provisions.

Requires federal agencies to write notices aimed at small business concerns on the single Government-wide point of entry in clear, concise, well-organized plain language, and to include searchable key words.

The Small Business Administration must issue implementing rules within 90 days; no additional funds are authorized.

Passage65/100

Narrow, low-cost, technocratic bill with limited opposition; main barriers are Senate scheduling and timely SBA rulemaking.

CredibilityPartially aligned

Relative to its intended legislative type, this bill sets a concise administrative requirement and delegates rulemaking to the SBA with a short deadline, but relies on future rules for substantive detail and omits compliance, accountability, and edge-case provisions.

Contention25/100

Liberals stress equity and access improvements; conservatives stress administrative restraint

02 · What it does

Who stands to gain, and who may push back.

Likely benefits vs burdens50% / 50%
Federal agencies · Small businessesLikely burdened

These are examples from the analysis, not a ranked list of the most-affected groups.

Likely helped
  • Federal agenciesSmall businesses can more easily find and understand federal contracting opportunities.
  • Potential benefitReducing complexity may lower time and proposal preparation costs for small firms.
  • Small businessesGreater clarity could expand competition and increase small business participation in procurements.
Likely burdened
  • Potential burdenAgencies may face additional administrative burden rewriting notices and training staff.
  • Potential burdenReformatting notices could cause short-term delays in posting opportunities.
  • Potential burdenTerms like 'maximum extent practicable' and 'plain language' may lead to inconsistent application.
03 · Why people split

Why the argument around this bill splits.

Liberals stress equity and access improvements; conservatives stress administrative restraint
Progressive85%

Generally supportive because the bill lowers information barriers for small and disadvantaged businesses and promotes equity in federal contracting access.

Concerned the law is narrow and lacks funding or strong enforcement mechanisms, so outcomes may depend on SBA rulemaking quality.

Leans supportive
Centrist80%

Favorable overall as a low-cost, common-sense reform to improve government efficiency and small business access.

Wants clear, measurable standards and stakeholder consultation to avoid unintended administrative burdens and inconsistent implementation.

Leans supportive
Conservative70%

Generally supportive because the bill simplifies government communications and can reduce regulatory friction for small businesses.

Wary that SBA rulemaking could expand administrative requirements beyond intended scope.

Leans supportive
04 · Can it pass?

The path through Congress.

Introduced

Reached or meaningfully advanced

Committee

Reached or meaningfully advanced

Floor

Still ahead

President

Still ahead

Law

Still ahead

Passage likelihood65/100

Narrow, low-cost, technocratic bill with limited opposition; main barriers are Senate scheduling and timely SBA rulemaking.

Scope and complexity
24%
Scopenarrow
24%
Complexitylow
Why this could stall
  • No CBO cost estimate or formal implementation cost data provided
  • Vague standards for what constitutes required 'key words'
05 · Recent votes

Recent votes on the bill.

No vote history yet

The bill has not accumulated any surfaced votes yet.

06 · Go deeper

Go deeper than the headline read.

Included on this page

Liberals stress equity and access improvements; conservatives stress administrative restraint

Narrow, low-cost, technocratic bill with limited opposition; main barriers are Senate scheduling and timely SBA rulemaking.

Unlocked analysis

Relative to its intended legislative type, this bill sets a concise administrative requirement and delegates rulemaking to the SBA with a short deadline, but relies on future rules for substantive detail and omits compl…

Go beyond the headline summary with full stakeholder mapping, legislative design analysis, passage barriers, and lens-by-lens tradeoff breakdowns.

Perspective breakdownsPassage barriersLegislative design reviewStakeholder impact map
Open full analysis