Referred to the House Committee on Energy and Commerce.
The Ultrasounds Save Lives Act of 2025 requires abortion providers operating in or affecting interstate commerce to perform an ultrasound and present results, and to obtain a signed Informed Consent Authorization at least 24 hours before any abortion except in medical emergencies. The form must state gestational age in completed days, list medical risks, and describe "major developmental characteristics" at that gestational age; providers must retain the form.
Liberals emphasize access and chilling effects; conservatives emphasize informed choice and fetal information.
Relative to its intended legislative type, this bill is a clearly focused substantive policy change that imposes new federally enforceable informed-consent requirements for abortions, with detailed form content, timing, retention, enforcement, and defined remedies.
The Ultrasounds Save Lives Act of 2025 requires abortion providers operating in or affecting interstate commerce to perform an ultrasound and present results, and to obtain a signed Informed Consent Authorization at least 24 hours before any abortion except in medical emergencies.
The form must state gestational age in completed days, list medical risks, and describe "major developmental characteristics" at that gestational age; providers must retain the form.
Enforcement is by the U.S. Attorney General with substantial civil penalties, and a private right of action allows a woman (or a parent of a minor) to sue for damages for violations.
High controversy, substantial private liability, federalization of abortion rules, and limited compromise features make enactment unlikely without strong aligned majorities.
Relative to its intended legislative type, this bill is a clearly focused substantive policy change that imposes new federally enforceable informed-consent requirements for abortions, with detailed form content, timing, retention, enforcement, and defined remedies.
Liberals emphasize access and chilling effects; conservatives emphasize informed choice and fetal information.
These are examples from the analysis, not a ranked list of the most-affected groups.
Liberals emphasize access and chilling effects; conservatives emphasize informed choice and fetal information.
Likely to oppose the bill overall.
They would view the law as a medically prescriptive and burdensome federal mandate that could restrict access to abortion, chill providers, and insert contested fetal-development claims into clinical care.
Mixed view: supports informed consent in principle but is concerned about federal reach, large penalties, and one-size-fits-all 24-hour timing.
Would want clearer medical accuracy, narrower federal enforcement, and safeguards for telehealth.
Likely to support the bill strongly.
It is seen as ensuring women receive fetal-development information and ultrasound results before consenting to abortion, and as providing enforcement mechanisms and private remedies.
Reached or meaningfully advanced
Reached or meaningfully advanced
Still ahead
Still ahead
Still ahead
High controversy, substantial private liability, federalization of abortion rules, and limited compromise features make enactment unlikely without strong aligned majorities.
The bill has not accumulated any surfaced votes yet.
Liberals emphasize access and chilling effects; conservatives emphasize informed choice and fetal information.
High controversy, substantial private liability, federalization of abortion rules, and limited compromise features make enactment unlikely…
Relative to its intended legislative type, this bill is a clearly focused substantive policy change that imposes new federally enforceable informed-consent requirements for abortions, with detailed form content, timing,…
Go beyond the headline summary with full stakeholder mapping, legislative design analysis, passage barriers, and lens-by-lens tradeoff breakdowns.