H.R. 7995 (119th)Bill Overview

CONNECT Act

Families|Families
Cosponsors
Support
Bipartisan
Introduced
Mar 19, 2026
Discussions
Bill Text
Current stageCommittee

Referred to the House Committee on Ways and Means.

Introduced
Committee
Floor
President
Law
Congressional Activities
01 · The brief

This bill updates the stated purposes of the John H.

Chafee Foster Care Program for Successful Transition to Adulthood to emphasize developing and maintaining sustained, supportive relationships for youth who experienced foster care at age 14 or older.

It adds language supporting youth participation in permanency planning, pre- and post-permanency peer support, mentoring, kin and community connections, and referrals to services.

Passage60/100

Technocratic, narrow amendment with limited cost and broad appeal increases odds, though floor time and competing priorities remain barriers.

CredibilityPartially aligned

Relative to its intended legislative type, this bill is a targeted substantive amendment to the Social Security Act that adds explicit purposes emphasizing sustained relationships and youth participation for the Chafee program and directs the Secretary of HHS to issue guidance. The statutory edits are specific and the bill sets responsible parties and timelines, but it omits fiscal provisions, detailed definitions, and concrete implementation metrics.

Contention30/100

Liberals emphasize funding and equity safeguards

02 · What it does

Who stands to gain, and who may push back.

Who this appears to help vs burden50% / 50%
Federal agencies · WorkersStates · Local governments
Likely helped
  • Federal agenciesGreater federal emphasis on mentoring and peer-support services for older foster youth.
  • Targeted stakeholdersStronger youth participation and documentation in permanency planning, potentially improving stability and outcomes.
  • WorkersPotential growth in jobs for mentors, peer-support specialists, and relationship-building caseworkers.
Likely burdened
  • StatesStates and Tribal agencies may face increased administrative and reporting burdens to document relationship activities.
  • Local governmentsNew or expanded services could require additional state or local spending without explicit new federal appropriations.
  • CitiesImplementation and effectiveness may vary widely across jurisdictions due to differing capacity and interpretation.
03 · Why people split

Why the argument around this bill splits.

Liberals emphasize funding and equity safeguards
Progressive90%

Likely to view the bill positively as a youth-centered strengthening of foster care supports, especially the emphasis on relationships and youth voice.

Will welcome mandated consultation with youth with lived experience and guidance on peer support and kin connections.

May press for explicit funding, equity safeguards, and attention to marginalized youth.

Leans supportive
Centrist80%

Sees the bill as a pragmatic, targeted improvement to Chafee program purposes and guidance.

Appreciates evidence-informed best practices and youth consultation, but is cautious about unfunded mandates and administrative burden on states.

Will favor clear, implementable guidance with measurable outcomes and flexible state implementation.

Leans supportive
Conservative60%

May provisionally support the goal of improving outcomes for foster youth but will be wary of expanded federal direction.

Concerned the HHS guidance could become de facto mandates or create new administrative burdens for states.

Prefers preserving state and local control and avoiding unfunded federal requirements.

Split reaction
04 · Can it pass?

The path through Congress.

Introduced

Reached or meaningfully advanced

Committee

Reached or meaningfully advanced

Floor

Still ahead

President

Still ahead

Law

Still ahead

Passage likelihood60/100

Technocratic, narrow amendment with limited cost and broad appeal increases odds, though floor time and competing priorities remain barriers.

Scope and complexity
24%
Scopenarrow
24%
Complexitylow
Why this could stall
  • No legislative cost estimate or CBO score included
  • Level of committee and floor scheduling priority
05 · Recent votes

Recent votes on the bill.

No vote history yet

The bill has not accumulated any surfaced votes yet.

06 · Go deeper

Go deeper than the headline read.

Included on this page

Liberals emphasize funding and equity safeguards

Technocratic, narrow amendment with limited cost and broad appeal increases odds, though floor time and competing priorities remain barrier…

Unlocked analysis

Relative to its intended legislative type, this bill is a targeted substantive amendment to the Social Security Act that adds explicit purposes emphasizing sustained relationships and youth participation for the Chafee…

Go beyond the headline summary with full stakeholder mapping, legislative design analysis, passage barriers, and lens-by-lens tradeoff breakdowns.

Perspective breakdownsPassage barriersLegislative design reviewStakeholder impact map
Open full analysis