Referred to the Subcommittee on Highways and Transit.
This bill bars federal agencies from requiring individuals to wear face masks related to COVID-19 while on conveyances or at transportation hubs. It nullifies the CDC’s January 29, 2021 mask order and related TSA directives and prevents future federal travel-mask requirements under existing law.
Public health authority versus individual liberty and federal limits
Relative to its intended legislative type, this bill is a straightforward substantive change that clearly and specifically prohibits federal mask requirements on conveyances and transportation hubs and expressly nullifies identified prior CDC and TSA actions.
This bill bars federal agencies from requiring individuals to wear face masks related to COVID-19 while on conveyances or at transportation hubs.
It nullifies the CDC’s January 29, 2021 mask order and related TSA directives and prevents future federal travel-mask requirements under existing law.
Content is narrow and administratively simple but highly polarizing; Senate thresholds and legal challenges reduce chances.
Relative to its intended legislative type, this bill is a straightforward substantive change that clearly and specifically prohibits federal mask requirements on conveyances and transportation hubs and expressly nullifies identified prior CDC and TSA actions. Its operative mechanism is precise and narrowly targeted.
Public health authority versus individual liberty and federal limits
These are examples from the analysis, not a ranked list of the most-affected groups.
Public health authority versus individual liberty and federal limits
Likely strongly opposed.
Sees the bill as a rollback of public health tools that protect vulnerable people and undermine agency authority.
Views the nullification of the CDC and TSA orders as removing an established, evidence-based mitigation option.
Mixed.
Appreciates clarified federal policy and reduced enforcement burdens, but worries about losing a nationwide tool for fast outbreak response.
Would favor narrowly tailored exceptions, evidence thresholds, or sunset provisions to balance liberty and public health.
Generally supportive.
Views the bill as limiting federal overreach and protecting individual choice and commerce.
Appreciates revoking CDC/TSA mandates and preventing future similar federal requirements on travel.
Reached or meaningfully advanced
Reached or meaningfully advanced
Still ahead
Still ahead
Still ahead
Content is narrow and administratively simple but highly polarizing; Senate thresholds and legal challenges reduce chances.
The bill has not accumulated any surfaced votes yet.
Public health authority versus individual liberty and federal limits
Content is narrow and administratively simple but highly polarizing; Senate thresholds and legal challenges reduce chances.
Relative to its intended legislative type, this bill is a straightforward substantive change that clearly and specifically prohibits federal mask requirements on conveyances and transportation hubs and expressly nullifi…
Go beyond the headline summary with full stakeholder mapping, legislative design analysis, passage barriers, and lens-by-lens tradeoff breakdowns.