- Federal agenciesIncreases transparency about first-time federal prime contract award recipients.
- Potential benefitGenerates disaggregated data on awards to SDVOSBs, HUBZone, SDBs, and women-owned firms.
- Potential benefitCreates an incentive for agencies to consider awarding contracts to new small-business entrants.
SPUR Act
Received in the Senate and Read twice and referred to the Committee on Small Business and Entrepreneurship.
Adds a new reporting requirement to the Small Business Act scorecards to count ‘‘new small business entrants’’ that win Federal prime contracts by NAICS code each fiscal year, including counts for SDVOSB, HUBZone, SDB, and women-owned firms, with year-over-year comparison if available. Defines "new small business entrant" and "scorecard" and makes no new appropriations.
Liberals want stronger enforcement and follow-up funding
Relative to its intended legislative type, this bill is a narrowly targeted administrative amendment that clearly adds a defined metric to the federal small-business scorecard framework and includes concise statutory definitions.
Adds a new reporting requirement to the Small Business Act scorecards to count ‘‘new small business entrants’’ that win Federal prime contracts by NAICS code each fiscal year, including counts for SDVOSB, HUBZone, SDB, and women-owned firms, with year-over-year comparison if available.
Defines "new small business entrant" and "scorecard" and makes no new appropriations.
Low-cost, technical reporting amendment with bipartisan appeal increases chances, but many such bills stall in committee or rely on legislative calendar placement.
Relative to its intended legislative type, this bill is a narrowly targeted administrative amendment that clearly adds a defined metric to the federal small-business scorecard framework and includes concise statutory definitions. It integrates directly into the existing statutory provision and declares no additional appropriations are required.
Liberals want stronger enforcement and follow-up funding
Who stands to gain, and who may push back.
These are examples from the analysis, not a ranked list of the most-affected groups.
- Potential burdenRequires additional data collection and reporting, increasing administrative burden on agencies.
- Potential burdenImplementation without new appropriations could strain contracting office workloads and IT resources.
- Potential burdenEmphasizing counts may incentivize awarding more small-value contracts instead of higher-value strategic awards.
Why the argument around this bill splits.
Liberals want stronger enforcement and follow-up funding
Likely views the bill positively as a transparency and equity improvement that highlights first-time federal contractors and historically disadvantaged owners.
Would welcome data that can reveal barriers and measure access, but may see the bill as limited without enforcement or funding for outreach.
Sees this as a modest, practical improvement to federal contracting transparency that is low-cost and unlikely to be controversial.
Would focus on implementation details to minimize burden and ensure data quality across agencies.
May be cautiously supportive because it promotes small business participation without new spending, but concerned about additional bureaucracy and potential mission creep in federal oversight.
Will scrutinize reporting burden and privacy implications of demographic tracking.
The path through Congress.
Reached or meaningfully advanced
Reached or meaningfully advanced
Still ahead
Still ahead
Still ahead
Low-cost, technical reporting amendment with bipartisan appeal increases chances, but many such bills stall in committee or rely on legislative calendar placement.
- Actual administrative cost and data-collection feasibility
- Agency capacity to implement new tracking requirements
Recent votes on the bill.
The House fast-tracked this bill — skipping normal debate — and it passed with a two-thirds majority. It now moves to the Senate.
What is a fast-track passage?Hide explanation
Suspending the rules allows the House to bypass normal debate procedures and pass a bill immediately with a two-thirds vote.
Go deeper than the headline read.
Liberals want stronger enforcement and follow-up funding
Low-cost, technical reporting amendment with bipartisan appeal increases chances, but many such bills stall in committee or rely on legisla…
Relative to its intended legislative type, this bill is a narrowly targeted administrative amendment that clearly adds a defined metric to the federal small-business scorecard framework and includes concise statutory de…
Go beyond the headline summary with full stakeholder mapping, legislative design analysis, passage barriers, and lens-by-lens tradeoff breakdowns.