H.R. 818 (119th)Bill Overview

SPUR Act

Commerce|CommerceEconomic performance and conditions
Cosponsors
Support
Republican
Introduced
Jan 28, 2025
Discussions
Bill Text
Current stageCommittee

Received in the Senate and Read twice and referred to the Committee on Small Business and Entrepreneurship.

Introduced
Committee
Floor
President
Law
Congressional Activities
01 · The brief
Plain-English summaryWhat this bill actually does

Adds a new reporting requirement to the Small Business Act scorecards to count ‘‘new small business entrants’’ that win Federal prime contracts by NAICS code each fiscal year, including counts for SDVOSB, HUBZone, SDB, and women-owned firms, with year-over-year comparison if available. Defines "new small business entrant" and "scorecard" and makes no new appropriations.

Why people may split

Liberals want stronger enforcement and follow-up funding

Watch point

Relative to its intended legislative type, this bill is a narrowly targeted administrative amendment that clearly adds a defined metric to the federal small-business scorecard framework and includes concise statutory definitions.

Adds a new reporting requirement to the Small Business Act scorecards to count ‘‘new small business entrants’’ that win Federal prime contracts by NAICS code each fiscal year, including counts for SDVOSB, HUBZone, SDB, and women-owned firms, with year-over-year comparison if available.

Defines "new small business entrant" and "scorecard" and makes no new appropriations.

Passage60/100

Low-cost, technical reporting amendment with bipartisan appeal increases chances, but many such bills stall in committee or rely on legislative calendar placement.

CredibilityAligned

Relative to its intended legislative type, this bill is a narrowly targeted administrative amendment that clearly adds a defined metric to the federal small-business scorecard framework and includes concise statutory definitions. It integrates directly into the existing statutory provision and declares no additional appropriations are required.

Contention30/100

Liberals want stronger enforcement and follow-up funding

02 · What it does

Who stands to gain, and who may push back.

Likely benefits vs burdens50% / 50%
Federal agenciesLikely burdened

These are examples from the analysis, not a ranked list of the most-affected groups.

Likely helped
  • Federal agenciesIncreases transparency about first-time federal prime contract award recipients.
  • Potential benefitGenerates disaggregated data on awards to SDVOSBs, HUBZone, SDBs, and women-owned firms.
  • Potential benefitCreates an incentive for agencies to consider awarding contracts to new small-business entrants.
Likely burdened
  • Potential burdenRequires additional data collection and reporting, increasing administrative burden on agencies.
  • Potential burdenImplementation without new appropriations could strain contracting office workloads and IT resources.
  • Potential burdenEmphasizing counts may incentivize awarding more small-value contracts instead of higher-value strategic awards.
03 · Why people split

Why the argument around this bill splits.

Liberals want stronger enforcement and follow-up funding
Progressive85%

Likely views the bill positively as a transparency and equity improvement that highlights first-time federal contractors and historically disadvantaged owners.

Would welcome data that can reveal barriers and measure access, but may see the bill as limited without enforcement or funding for outreach.

Leans supportive
Centrist80%

Sees this as a modest, practical improvement to federal contracting transparency that is low-cost and unlikely to be controversial.

Would focus on implementation details to minimize burden and ensure data quality across agencies.

Leans supportive
Conservative65%

May be cautiously supportive because it promotes small business participation without new spending, but concerned about additional bureaucracy and potential mission creep in federal oversight.

Will scrutinize reporting burden and privacy implications of demographic tracking.

Split reaction
04 · Can it pass?

The path through Congress.

Introduced

Reached or meaningfully advanced

Committee

Reached or meaningfully advanced

Floor

Still ahead

President

Still ahead

Law

Still ahead

Passage likelihood60/100

Low-cost, technical reporting amendment with bipartisan appeal increases chances, but many such bills stall in committee or rely on legislative calendar placement.

Scope and complexity
24%
Scopenarrow
24%
Complexitylow
Why this could stall
  • Actual administrative cost and data-collection feasibility
  • Agency capacity to implement new tracking requirements
05 · Recent votes

Recent votes on the bill.

HOUSE · Feb 25, 2025
Fast-track passage✓ PassedBipartisanNear-unanimous
2/3 majority required

The House fast-tracked this bill — skipping normal debate — and it passed with a two-thirds majority. It now moves to the Senate.

What is a fast-track passage?

Suspending the rules allows the House to bypass normal debate procedures and pass a bill immediately with a two-thirds vote.

Yes 94% No 6%
Against party line
Showing a quick cross-section of legislators, with followed members first when available.
06 · Go deeper

Go deeper than the headline read.

Included on this page

Liberals want stronger enforcement and follow-up funding

Low-cost, technical reporting amendment with bipartisan appeal increases chances, but many such bills stall in committee or rely on legisla…

Unlocked analysis

Relative to its intended legislative type, this bill is a narrowly targeted administrative amendment that clearly adds a defined metric to the federal small-business scorecard framework and includes concise statutory de…

Go beyond the headline summary with full stakeholder mapping, legislative design analysis, passage barriers, and lens-by-lens tradeoff breakdowns.

Perspective breakdownsPassage barriersLegislative design reviewStakeholder impact map
Open full analysis