H.R. 8197 (119th)Bill Overview

To terminate the All-domain Anomaly Resolution Office of the Department of Defense, and for other purposes.

Armed Forces and National Security|Armed Forces and National Security
Cosponsors
Support
Republican
Introduced
Apr 6, 2026
Discussions
Bill Text
Current stageCommittee

Referred to the Committee on Armed Services, and in addition to the Committee on Intelligence (Permanent Select), for a period to be subsequently determined by the Speaker, in eac…

Introduced
Committee
Floor
President
Law
Congressional Activities
01 · The brief

The bill requires the Secretary of Defense to terminate the All-domain Anomaly Resolution Office (AARO) within 60 days and transfer its functions to other Department of Defense elements.

It prohibits creating within DOD or the Office of the Director of National Intelligence an equivalent single, centralized office for unidentified anomalous phenomena.

The bill repeals the statutory authorization for the AARO (section 1683, NDAA FY2022) and makes conforming amendments to related NDAA provisions; amendments take effect 60 days after enactment.

Passage15/100

Narrow but intrusive on defense/intel structures, lacks compromise features, and faces likely resistance from committees and agencies responsible for national security.

CredibilityPartially aligned

Relative to its intended legislative type, this bill is a straightforward administrative/operational measure that clearly orders termination of the All-domain Anomaly Resolution Office, effects statutory repeal and amendment, and imposes a prohibition on creating a similar single centralized entity, but it leaves significant operational, fiscal, and accountability details to executive implementation without statutory specification.

Contention65/100

Progressives emphasize transparency, scientific coordination, and record continuity

02 · What it does

Who stands to gain, and who may push back.

Who this appears to help vs burden50% / 50%
Targeted stakeholdersTargeted stakeholders
Likely helped
  • Targeted stakeholdersSupporters may claim reduced administrative overhead by dissolving a separate centralized office.
  • Targeted stakeholdersTransfers could integrate UAP responsibilities into existing military and intelligence structures.
  • Targeted stakeholdersProhibition on recreating a central office may prevent concentration of authority over UAP matters.
Likely burdened
  • Targeted stakeholdersCritics may say loss of a centralized office will reduce coordination across services and agencies.
  • Targeted stakeholdersCentralization repeal could weaken sustained expertise and institutional memory on anomalous phenomena investigations.
  • Targeted stakeholdersThe change may impair aviation safety investigations and timely information sharing with civilian agencies.
03 · Why people split

Why the argument around this bill splits.

Progressives emphasize transparency, scientific coordination, and record continuity
Progressive25%

Likely views the bill negatively because it dismantles a centralized office created to coordinate investigation and transparency of unidentified phenomena.

Concern will focus on fragmentation of records, loss of institutional expertise, and reduced public reporting and scientific study.

Some may see a small benefit in preventing unchecked secretive authorities, but overall oppose unless transparency safeguards are added.

Likely resistant
Centrist55%

A pragmatic view: the bill reduces a standalone bureaucracy but raises questions about operational continuity and national security.

Support will depend on assured, well-defined transfer plans, preserved reporting to Congress, and measures preventing capability gaps.

Skeptical of ideological motives but open to compromise if implementation details are specified.

Split reaction
Conservative80%

Generally favorable: terminates an additional federal office, reduces bureaucracy, and blocks creation of a new centralized entity with broad authority.

Support is tempered by pragmatic national security concerns about preserving threat-detection capabilities and ensuring functions are absorbed by appropriate defense intelligence elements.

Leans supportive
04 · Can it pass?

The path through Congress.

Introduced

Reached or meaningfully advanced

Committee

Reached or meaningfully advanced

Floor

Still ahead

President

Still ahead

Law

Still ahead

Passage likelihood15/100

Narrow but intrusive on defense/intel structures, lacks compromise features, and faces likely resistance from committees and agencies responsible for national security.

Scope and complexity
24%
Scopenarrow
24%
Complexitylow
Why this could stall
  • Absent cost estimate for transfers and record handling
  • Views of DoD and intelligence leadership not in text
05 · Recent votes

Recent votes on the bill.

No vote history yet

The bill has not accumulated any surfaced votes yet.

06 · Go deeper

Go deeper than the headline read.

Included on this page

Progressives emphasize transparency, scientific coordination, and record continuity

Narrow but intrusive on defense/intel structures, lacks compromise features, and faces likely resistance from committees and agencies respo…

Unlocked analysis

Relative to its intended legislative type, this bill is a straightforward administrative/operational measure that clearly orders termination of the All-domain Anomaly Resolution Office, effects statutory repeal and amen…

Go beyond the headline summary with full stakeholder mapping, legislative design analysis, passage barriers, and lens-by-lens tradeoff breakdowns.

Perspective breakdownsPassage barriersLegislative design reviewStakeholder impact map
Open full analysis