- Federal agenciesEasier access to agency guidance for small businesses through centralized hyperlinks.
- Small businessesReduced time spent searching regulatory interpretations, potentially lowering small business compliance costs.
- Federal agenciesGreater transparency and public visibility into guidance that interprets agency rules.
POST IT Act of 2025
Referred to the House Committee on Small Business.
The POST IT Act amends Section 30 of the Small Business Act to require the Small Business and Agriculture Regulatory Enforcement Ombudsman, to the extent practicable, to provide hyperlinks on its website to guidance documents that set forth policy or interpretations for rules that have a Small Entity Compliance Guide. It exempts information protected from public disclosure under FOIA and applies to guidance associated with such rules produced on or after enactment.
Left emphasizes safeguarding substantive protections from being weakened
Relative to its intended legislative type, this bill is a narrowly scoped administrative amendment that directs the Ombudsman to publish hyperlinks to certain guidance, integrates cleanly with existing statutes, and appropriately acknowledges funding limits; it is specific enough to change practice but leaves implementation-level details, timelines, and accountability mechanisms to existing administrative processes or future action.
The POST IT Act amends Section 30 of the Small Business Act to require the Small Business and Agriculture Regulatory Enforcement Ombudsman, to the extent practicable, to provide hyperlinks on its website to guidance documents that set forth policy or interpretations for rules that have a Small Entity Compliance Guide.
It exempts information protected from public disclosure under FOIA and applies to guidance associated with such rules produced on or after enactment.
The bill authorizes no new appropriations.
Low-cost, technical transparency bill has reasonable chance, especially as part of broader legislation; standalone timing uncertain.
Relative to its intended legislative type, this bill is a narrowly scoped administrative amendment that directs the Ombudsman to publish hyperlinks to certain guidance, integrates cleanly with existing statutes, and appropriately acknowledges funding limits; it is specific enough to change practice but leaves implementation-level details, timelines, and accountability mechanisms to existing administrative processes or future action.
Left emphasizes safeguarding substantive protections from being weakened
Who stands to gain, and who may push back.
These are examples from the analysis, not a ranked list of the most-affected groups.
- Potential burdenCreates an unfunded administrative task for the Ombudsman and agencies to identify and link guidance.
- Potential burdenRequires ongoing maintenance to keep hyperlinks current, increasing staff time and resource needs.
- Potential burdenCentralizing links may produce incomplete or outdated compilations, causing regulatory confusion.
Why the argument around this bill splits.
Left emphasizes safeguarding substantive protections from being weakened
Overall supportive of increased transparency for small businesses but cautious about possible effects on regulatory substance.
Likely to view the bill as a modest administrative improvement that could help small firms understand regulations, while watching for any moves that convert guidance into de facto weaker regulation.
May want safeguards to ensure worker and environmental protections are preserved.
Generally favorable as a low-cost, pragmatic step to centralize guidance links for small entities.
Views the measure as an incremental administrative fix that improves usability without expanding regulatory authority or budgetary commitments.
Will watch implementation details and legal clarity around what counts as 'guidance.'
Likely supportive of transparency and reduced compliance friction for small businesses, but attentive to any added administrative obligations.
Values the FOIA carve-out and the bill's no-cost design; may be wary if the requirement effectively elevates guidance to binding status or increases federal administrative workload.
The path through Congress.
Reached or meaningfully advanced
Reached or meaningfully advanced
Still ahead
Still ahead
Still ahead
Low-cost, technical transparency bill has reasonable chance, especially as part of broader legislation; standalone timing uncertain.
- No cost estimate or implementation burden assessment provided
- Potential agency resistance over administrative workload
Recent votes on the bill.
No vote history yet
The bill has not accumulated any surfaced votes yet.
Go deeper than the headline read.
Left emphasizes safeguarding substantive protections from being weakened
Low-cost, technical transparency bill has reasonable chance, especially as part of broader legislation; standalone timing uncertain.
Relative to its intended legislative type, this bill is a narrowly scoped administrative amendment that directs the Ombudsman to publish hyperlinks to certain guidance, integrates cleanly with existing statutes, and app…
Go beyond the headline summary with full stakeholder mapping, legislative design analysis, passage barriers, and lens-by-lens tradeoff breakdowns.