Placed on the Union Calendar, Calendar No. 234.
Creates an interest-bearing Treasury account called the Non‑Federal Funding Account for the Lower Colorado River Multi‑Species Conservation Program. It requires deposit of prior and future non‑Federal contributions, allows investment only in U.S. interest‑bearing obligations, makes principal available without further appropriation for Program Documents, makes interest available subject to appropriation, and states State Parties are not liable for investment losses.
Liberal emphasizes conservation funding and protection of state contributions
Relative to its intended legislative type, this bill is a focused administrative amendment that clearly establishes a Treasury fund for non‑Federal contributions and specifies concrete deposit, investment, and availability rules.
Creates an interest-bearing Treasury account called the Non‑Federal Funding Account for the Lower Colorado River Multi‑Species Conservation Program.
It requires deposit of prior and future non‑Federal contributions, allows investment only in U.S. interest‑bearing obligations, makes principal available without further appropriation for Program Documents, makes interest available subject to appropriation, and states State Parties are not liable for investment losses.
Small, technical, regionally focused finance fix with limited fiscal impact; typically attracts bipartisan support though budget scoring questions could slow progress.
Relative to its intended legislative type, this bill is a focused administrative amendment that clearly establishes a Treasury fund for non‑Federal contributions and specifies concrete deposit, investment, and availability rules. It integrates with the named Agreement and existing statute and sets basic transfer timing and investment constraints.
Liberal emphasizes conservation funding and protection of state contributions
These are examples from the analysis, not a ranked list of the most-affected groups.
Liberal emphasizes conservation funding and protection of state contributions
Likely favorable.
The bill secures non‑Federal contributions, permits those sums to earn interest, and limits investment risk to U.S. obligations.
It aligns with conserving river species and protecting partner contributions, while noting interest use depends on future appropriations.
Cautiously supportive.
The bill is a technical fiscal fix that secures contributions and reduces investment risk, but needs clear reporting, budget clarity, and assurance appropriations will allow interest to be used effectively.
Skeptical to somewhat opposed.
While technical, the bill creates a special Treasury account that may enable spending without fresh appropriations, and establishes precedent for earmarked, protected funds managed by the federal government.
Reached or meaningfully advanced
Reached or meaningfully advanced
Still ahead
Still ahead
Still ahead
Small, technical, regionally focused finance fix with limited fiscal impact; typically attracts bipartisan support though budget scoring questions could slow progress.
The bill has not accumulated any surfaced votes yet.
Liberal emphasizes conservation funding and protection of state contributions
Small, technical, regionally focused finance fix with limited fiscal impact; typically attracts bipartisan support though budget scoring qu…
Relative to its intended legislative type, this bill is a focused administrative amendment that clearly establishes a Treasury fund for non‑Federal contributions and specifies concrete deposit, investment, and availabil…
Go beyond the headline summary with full stakeholder mapping, legislative design analysis, passage barriers, and lens-by-lens tradeoff breakdowns.