Referred to the House Committee on Natural Resources.
This bill amends Title 54 to prohibit use of Land and Water Conservation Fund (LWCF) financial assistance to acquire land, water, or interests in land or water from private landowners. It adds an acquisition restriction for States receiving LWCF assistance and inserts a conforming prohibition on using appropriations from the Fund for acquisitions from private landowners.
Progressives emphasize lost conservation tools and habitat impacts.
Relative to its intended legislative type, this bill is a concise statutory prohibition that directly amends specific provisions of title 54 to bar State use of Land and Water Conservation Fund assistance to acquire land, water, or interests from private landowners.
This bill amends Title 54 to prohibit use of Land and Water Conservation Fund (LWCF) financial assistance to acquire land, water, or interests in land or water from private landowners.
It adds an acquisition restriction for States receiving LWCF assistance and inserts a conforming prohibition on using appropriations from the Fund for acquisitions from private landowners.
Content is narrow and administrable, aiding House prospects, but significant Senate resistance and stakeholder opposition lower overall odds.
Relative to its intended legislative type, this bill is a concise statutory prohibition that directly amends specific provisions of title 54 to bar State use of Land and Water Conservation Fund assistance to acquire land, water, or interests from private landowners. The core legal change is clear in form but sparse in ancillary detail.
Progressives emphasize lost conservation tools and habitat impacts.
These are examples from the analysis, not a ranked list of the most-affected groups.
Progressives emphasize lost conservation tools and habitat impacts.
Likely opposed.
This persona will view the bill as a direct constraint on a key conservation tool used to secure habitat, public recreational access, and conservation easements.
They will worry it reduces state and federal ability to protect lands and waters for climate resilience and biodiversity.
Mixed/guarded.
This persona recognizes protecting private property and limiting federal acquisition can be legitimate, but is concerned about losing a practical conservation tool.
They will weigh tradeoffs and want clarifying limits or narrowly drawn exceptions.
Generally supportive.
This persona will see the bill as protecting individual property rights and limiting federal expansion into land acquisition.
They will value constraints on federal spending and prefer state and private-sector solutions.
Reached or meaningfully advanced
Reached or meaningfully advanced
Still ahead
Still ahead
Still ahead
Content is narrow and administrable, aiding House prospects, but significant Senate resistance and stakeholder opposition lower overall odds.
The bill has not accumulated any surfaced votes yet.
Progressives emphasize lost conservation tools and habitat impacts.
Content is narrow and administrable, aiding House prospects, but significant Senate resistance and stakeholder opposition lower overall odd…
Relative to its intended legislative type, this bill is a concise statutory prohibition that directly amends specific provisions of title 54 to bar State use of Land and Water Conservation Fund assistance to acquire lan…
Go beyond the headline summary with full stakeholder mapping, legislative design analysis, passage barriers, and lens-by-lens tradeoff breakdowns.